Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gravity waves 'around the corner'
Nature News ^ | 19 August 2009 | Calla Cofield

Posted on 08/22/2009 10:05:51 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: SunkenCiv

Thanks.

You mean gravity waves come along once in a coon’s age?

LOL.


21 posted on 08/23/2009 9:38:41 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Quix

If I said that, I mask have been mistaken. ;’)


22 posted on 08/23/2009 10:05:15 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

LOL.

THX.


23 posted on 08/23/2009 12:03:06 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: allmost
The two competing theories currently used work extremely well in there respective fields.

The aim of science is to find the universal laws of physics. Both relativity and quantum mechanics are limited in their applications. And they contradict each other. In logic in only takes one counter example to disprove a proposition. Are you proposing that science throw logic out the window?

The graviton won’t show up. String theories are garbage science IMO. Even it’s proponents concede that to even begin getting useful results they need to fudge in an extra dimension, M-theory. 11 dimensions to describe a three dimensional, inverse square, phenomenon.

As I said, the hunt for a better theory is on. It's too early to say what that theory will be. But for about 60 years physicists worked in their respective fields and didn't talk to physicists in other fields. Those days are gone. Physicists from all fields are now talking to each other. And now physics must deal with the contradiction at the heart of its discipline.

24 posted on 08/23/2009 12:51:09 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Try doing google searches on "Dayton Miller"...

Perhaps his theories need closer examination now that physicists are dealing honestly with the contradiction at the heart of their discipline.

25 posted on 08/23/2009 1:04:54 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776

Miller isn’t known for theories; what he did was to run a more accurate version of the MM experiment, and it didn’t fail. That’s fact and not theory and, to my knowledge, that eliminates the basis for relativity.


26 posted on 08/23/2009 1:18:19 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
Miller isn’t known for theories; what he did was to run a more accurate version of the MM experiment, and it didn’t fail. That’s fact and not theory and, to my knowledge, that eliminates the basis for relativity.

Science is about theories and measurements. The value of a theory is that it predicts measurements. Measurements are always approximate. But if measurements are close to the theoretical predictions, then it's a good theory.

As far as I can tell, Miller took measurements that seem to support theories about the existence of an ether drift to explain the constant speed of light. Today I don't think most physicists think the ether exists, but it might be worth looking into again. Whether the ether exists or not, relativity is limited in its applications, as Newtonian physics is limited in its applications.

27 posted on 08/23/2009 1:33:41 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: stripes1776
Let me run something else by you.... Suppose you were on safari on the Serengeti and you saw elephant dung and lion dung lying about on the plain. Would you figure that both lions and elephants were in the area, or would you figure that some magical animal with properties of both lions AND elephants was around??

The idea of "photons" makes about as much sense as the animal with properties of lions and elephants. When you see evidence of both waves and particles, the simplest explanation is that both waves and particles are present.

The wave/particle thing with light is probably similar to the situation for rifle fire in which waves moving at around 1100 fps are being created by bullets moving through the air much faster than that. The medium which light waves move through is probably a neutrino soup aether such as Wal Thornhill describes and the waves themselves move at a limit value which is C. The particles are probably Ralph Sansbury's sub-electron particles and the speed they move at is as Sansbury describes, around 10^22 m/sec. That would get you to one of the near galaxies in a couple of seconds.

28 posted on 08/23/2009 1:44:25 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Larry381

Yes.


29 posted on 08/23/2009 1:45:05 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit The law will be followed, dammit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wendy1946
The idea of "photons" makes about as much sense as the animal with properties of lions and elephants. When you see evidence of both waves and particles, the simplest explanation is that both waves and particles are present.

Your main idea: both waves and particles are present. If light is a particle, what do you call it in your theory?

The wave/particle thing with light is probably similar to the situation for rifle fire in which waves moving at around 1100 fps are being created by bullets moving through the air much faster than that. The medium which light waves move through is probably a neutrino soup aether such as Wal Thornhill describes and the waves themselves move at a limit value which is C. The particles are probably Ralph Sansbury's sub-electron particles and the speed they move at is as Sansbury describes, around 10^22 m/sec. That would get you to one of the near galaxies in a couple of seconds.

You are saying that light is a particle moving through some medium. But all we see is the effect light has on the medium which moves at speed c. OK, but why doesn't Galilean relativity apply? Well, measurements show that it doesn't. So now we have to apply ether or "wave" drift theories. And the particles themselves we know nothing about except this idea that they are moving 10^22 m/sec. I would say there is a lot more soup here than just a neutrino soup. I would call this the Minestrone Soup theory: just throw in whatever you have in the frige. When you get a consensus on that one among physicists, let me know.

30 posted on 08/23/2009 2:42:55 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; Swordmaker

This is just to suggest that maybe Amelino-Camelia’s quantized space-time and Einstein’s smoothly curving model may be in some sense “complementarities.”

Thank you again for the ping, Kevmo! Please keep me posted if you see anything more on this subject — I’ll be looking, too.

13 posted on Sunday, August 16, 2009 1:01:59 PM by betty boop (Without God man neither knows which way to go, nor even understands who he is. —Pope Benedict XVI)
***Okay, here ya go. I’m including Alamo-Girl and Swordmaker


31 posted on 08/23/2009 6:57:08 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: betty boop

oops, I shoulda pinged you earlier...


32 posted on 08/23/2009 7:48:44 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

Thanks for the ping, dear Kevmo!


33 posted on 08/23/2009 10:02:19 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Drove by LIGO (Hanford) today. It’s still there.


34 posted on 08/23/2009 10:12:23 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Tigger: Ha ha ha, she called me “dear.” Roo, are you ready for some bouncing?
Roo: Yeah! You and me are good bouncers!
Kanga: Just a moment, dear. ...
www.lavasurfer.com/wtp/pooh-transcript.html


35 posted on 08/23/2009 10:30:33 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
LOLOL! Thanks for link, dear Kevmo!
36 posted on 08/23/2009 10:35:34 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

I just thought of a good expression for LIGO, which is what we used to say about Gallium Arsenide: The future of technology and always will be. I think gravity waves will always be “just around the corner”.


37 posted on 08/23/2009 10:44:43 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Silver Surfer

38 posted on 08/23/2009 10:50:02 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo

LOLOL! The gravity wave quest reminds me of the Higgs field/boson quest...


39 posted on 08/23/2009 11:14:38 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

At least with Higgs-Boson one can actually put their money where their mouth is, buying or selling contracts at Intrade. I suggested a LIGO contract but they aren’t interested.

Suggested contract: Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory detects gravity waves
http://bb.intrade.com/intradeForum/posts/list/4072.page

Observation of the Higgs Boson Particle
Contract Bid Ask Last Vol Chge
HIGGS.BOSON.DEC09
Higgs Boson Particle to be observed on/before 31 Dec 2009 M Trade - 9.9 2.0 450 0
HIGGS.BOSON.DEC10
Higgs Boson Particle to be observed on/before 31 Dec 2010 M Trade 12.1 24.9 17.0 144 0

Suggested contract: Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory detects gravity waves


40 posted on 08/23/2009 11:40:26 PM PDT by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson