Skip to comments.
US Mulling over Uranium Enrichment in Iran (Is 0 about to accept a Nuclear Iran?)
FARS News Agency ^
| 10/19/2009
| Unattributed
Posted on 10/19/2009 1:10:02 PM PDT by mojito
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Informed sources close to the talks in Vienna said that the US has in a series of secret meetings informed its European partners of Washington's decision on acceptance of uranium enrichment in Iran.
21
posted on
10/19/2009 3:15:34 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: mojito
That was the plan all along.
22
posted on
10/19/2009 3:31:43 PM PDT
by
freedomtrail
(To hell and back reliability.....sigarms.)
To: mojito
Sounds like ...
CARTER/KOREA II
23
posted on
10/19/2009 4:02:54 PM PDT
by
gwilhelm56
(I will DIE with Israel BY MY SIDE, rather than LIVE with the CHAINS of ISLAM on my Back!)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
24
posted on
10/19/2009 4:55:59 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(In wine there is wisdom, In beer there is freedom, In water there is bacteria.)
To: Tzimisce
25
posted on
10/19/2009 5:05:57 PM PDT
by
Rick_Michael
(Have no fear "President Government" is here)
To: mojito
(Is 0 about to accept a Nuclear Iran?) He already has! Long ago!
26
posted on
10/19/2009 5:07:06 PM PDT
by
airborne
(I'm from an older generation. When killing the enemy was a good thing!)
To: maquiladora
27
posted on
10/19/2009 5:38:29 PM PDT
by
jhpigott
To: mojito
The subject of Iran's uranium enrichment and WMD aspirations cannot be settled without several other parties participating who have a stake in the outcome.
The Sunnis (primarily Arabs), the Israelis, and the Europeans all have excellent reasons to keep the Iranians from obtaining WMD. The Russians probably want a belligerent Iran, it seems to destabilize the region and drive up the price of oil.
So it is hard to imagine that Bam alone can agree to Iran getting WMD. Israel in particular is not going to go along with that idea. Would Bam stop Israel if they try to take out the Iranian enrichment infrastructure?
Bam is playing a very dangerous game. And not one that seems to have US best interests at heart.
schu
28
posted on
10/19/2009 6:53:37 PM PDT
by
schu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson