Posted on 02/16/2010 8:10:38 AM PST by rabscuttle385
Bob, you truly have lost it, you are now siding with antiwar nutbars in your efforts to attack Palin.
Glad to see you’ve joined the anti-war paultards.
LOL, that coming from people who were for the war before they were against it? Palin has been consistent on this issue.
Oh, and Bob, you moron, amnesty was not the subject of the original post, the defense budget and the WOT is. Show me where on this thread I have commented on the amnesty change of subject that was introduced.
I see. If I’m a fiscally conscious conservative who is concerned about the effects of defense spending on taxes and budget deficits, I’m an “antiwar nutbar”.
And if I have questions about Palin’s readiness for the oval office I’m a mysoginist and I hate woman.
And if I’m concerned that Palin’s popularity has more to do with religion/evangelisism than politics I’m a Christian basher.
And if I take up any position at odds with the owner of the website I’m a lib troll and anti-FReeper.
Do you have any idea how ridiculous and hysterical you sound?
Bob, national defense is something the fedgov is SUPPOSED to be doing.
But there is just one word that describes you to a 'T' lately - a@@hole.
“Oh, and Bob, you moron, amnesty was not the subject of the original post, the defense budget and the WOT is. Show me where on this thread I have commented on the amnesty change of subject that was introduced.”
Fair enough. Would you like to comment on post #3 or just ignore it like all the Palinistas do?
Where do you stand on Palin’s position that some form of amnesty will be needed to address the immigation prblem?
Simple Pentagon good, Department of whateverelse bad.
I will wait and see what Palin says when she is not part of the McCain presidential campaign. Do you really think she was going to stray far from McCain’s viewpoints on immigration while being interviewed as his VP candidate during the 2008 campaign?
“Bob, national defense is something the fedgov is SUPPOSED to be doing.”
Uhh, okay. What’s your point?
That whining about fiscal conservativism when it comes to national defense - something that the fedgov is SUPPOSED to be doing - is as stupid as any one of your other recent posts.
The second half sucked - one speaker after another praising GW Bush (best president mexico ever had!), his limitless spending and his endless wars.
As far as Palin goes, I didn't like some of the things she was saying during the campaign... she seemed weak on immigration and very pro-war, but I was willing to cut her some slack because I figured she was just parroting McCain's positions. I don't even hold it against her for endorsing McCain - you dance with the one who brought you. He put her on the national stage and she's grateful to him for doing so.
Unfortunately, it's starting to look like she shares the same foreign policy outlook as GWB, McCain and obama - the idiotic neocon BS belief that the US has the right to intervene in the affairs of any nation (as long as it's weak and seemingly defenseless), anywhere, any time and for any reason.
Lest we all forget, she was one half of the GOP presidential ticket that was advocating military confrontation with nuclear-armed Russia over an event taking place on their border, of no strategic interest to the US, and on the wrong damn side too!
“I will wait and see what Palin says when she is not part of the McCain presidential campaign.”
Well, we’ve all been waiting for over a year. Do you think she hasn’t had the opportunity or venue to do so, you know, with that busy speech and Fox commentator schedule?
Jeez, you're turning into a bigger moron with each passing day.
“That whining about fiscal conservativism when it comes to national defense...”
You know, I’m just going to let that on sit out there and ferment for a while.
>Are you advocating non-enforcement of valid U.S. law?
That would be horrible!
Therefore I suggest that you turn yourelf in immediately. I guarantee you have missed a stoplight (if even by a hair), or nudged an IRS bill (if even by a couple bucks) or missed some obscure city ordinance. Therefore, since all laws are of equal value, off to the hoosegow with you!
Yes, we must immediately imprison 11 million illegals in camps, then drive them on a Bataan march across the Rio.
Yeah, and maybe you could contemplate how much you are channeling the libs who opposed the cost of Reagan's defense buildup in the 1980s, you moron.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.