Doctors barred from using new cancer treatment equipment

guardian.co.uk ^ | 5/2/10 | Denis Campbell, Health Correspondent

[Clintonfatigued]

Great Britain is going downhill fast.

[Gil4]

From the article:

“...it is not convinced the robotic radiosurgery system works.”

Is there a question about the effectiveness of the technology? Is there possibly a problem with the particular system installed?

Is there any possible reasonable explanation for this other than bureaucrats being bureaucrats?

[verity]

"Coming to a US hospital near you."

Ignorant comment.

[b4its2late]

You think new technology will be as readily available as it has been under Obamacare? You better get your head out of your butt.

[verity]

"You think new technology will be as readily available as it has been under Obamacare?"

Speaking of getting one's head out of his recturm...lol

[b4its2late]

So tell me what wisdom you have to enlighten me about how Obamacare is going to or not going to affect new medical procedures, medical and pharmaceutical research or technological advances in the healthcare arena?

[verity]

"You think new technology will be as readily available as it has been under Obamacare?"

Examine your phraseology which conveys that new technology has been readily available under Obamacare.
It should be amended to read: "You think new technology will be as readily available as it has been under Obamacare?"

[dila813]

No, because if it was a system issue then you would be reading something different.

“NHS Hospital attempting to recover investment in New Cancer Treatment Equipment that was delivered Defective”

[hinckley buzzard]

The Death Panel says "No. Costs too much. Try pain pills instead."