Posted on 06/27/2010 12:17:07 PM PDT by Palter
So he pushed a lot of buttons, now he's getting some attention at last! Maybe he can sell his story to Rolling Stone.
Consider what happened to an unemployed American, Bruce Shore, because of e-mails he sent to the Web site of U.S. Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky. As reported by Arthur Delaney on huffingtonpost.com, Shore, watching the Senate in inaction on C-Span, was angered when Bunning complained that, gosh, he has missed the Kentucky-South Carolina basketball game because he had to be in Congress to debate an unemployment benefits bill. "I was livid, I was just livid," recalled the 51-year-old Shore. "I'm on unemployment, so it affects me." Here is part of his Feb. 26 messages to Bunning staffers: "Are you'all insane. No checks equal no food for me. Do you get it?"
Well, the reason why I give half a care about this is legitimate political protest via Email could just as easily be prosecuted under such a vague definition as Shore is being prosecuted on.
For example “your” name isn’t “ARepublicanForAllReasons” yet if you send a single email that the recepient doesn’t approve of, using your nom de plume, you or even I could be prosecuted under the charge of “annoying”.
There is a fine line between legitimate protest and self-expression, and criminal behavior in this country. What's worse is, the rules seem to shift arbitrarily.
Well, I am still going to call my CongressCritter a Dunkin' Donut Hole if I feel like it! I might even use PJ O'Rourke's expression 'Parliament of Whores'.
Ersatz child porn and political speech are completelty different things though.
You can apparently call a Rep a “dunken donut A*hole” but if your name is “Burt’ do not send an email signed ‘Bertrude”..hehehe
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.