Posted on 07/13/2010 6:07:24 AM PDT by blueyon
Agreed again. But as someone else said, non-violence is the GREATEST weapon we can use at TP rallies. I can guarantee we’ll outnumber them 20 - or 50 - to one.
www.honeyisland.org
Pretty much done since the DOJ won't prosecute blacks or minorities anymore.
Voter intimidation? New Black Panthers and old White Citizens Council - Brothers under the skin.
So we are supposed to be afraid of the Clan with a Tan? These welfare babies don’t even know how to hold the sites vertical. And I bet no training or range time either.
Entertainment - a joke.
Vizalize it as: "black men jumping up and down with spears, screaming, stomping their feet and looking as mad as they can and "white men" sitting in tanks - fully armed - wearing Bermuda shorts and looking like their getting ready to go to a picnic. Now which group is REALLY scary?
Here's how liberals REALLY THINK: If a white person said these types of hateful comments, liberals would be afraid because they feel white people are the most effective and violent people on the planet. Black people ( as seen by liberals) are harmless and silly. They get their spears and jump up and down - or shoot bullets into the air - and look macho. In short, liberals laugh at black anger - they don't even cover it. How fearful are any of us of a 5 year old stumping their feet and making big threats?
And that's why the liberal press doesn't cover black threats. They see black anger as impotent. Funny. Fox and Friends covered the subject last Saturday - and all the liberals were laughing at the black threats. Then conservatives on the show started laughing too. It was oddly insulting. They would NEVER laugh if Tea Party people made threats...
That's how black anger is seen. Impotent.
Now, get a Tea Party together - white men and women, black conservatives, intelligent young people - and there's a real threat.
Black radicals do their best to look threatening - guns, baseball bats, military type clothing - all for affect. With white Tea Party members it's to opposite. The men wearing light pastels shirts, shorts and women with soft make-up and appropriate earrings... And which group is more threatening? Trust me - the Tea Party people.
Entertainment - a joke.
Visualize it as: "black men jumping up and down with spears, screaming, stomping their feet and looking as mad as they can and "white men" sitting in tanks - fully armed - wearing Bermuda shorts and looking like their getting ready to go to a picnic. Now which group is REALLY scary?
Here's how liberals REALLY THINK: If a white person said these types of hateful comments, liberals would be afraid because they feel white people are the most effective and violent people on the planet. Black people ( as seen by liberals) are harmless and silly. They get their spears and jump up and down - or shoot bullets into the air - and look macho. In short, liberals laugh at black anger - they don't even cover it. How fearful are any of us of a 5 year old stumping their feet and making big threats?
And that's why the liberal press doesn't cover black threats. They see black anger as impotent. Funny. Fox and Friends covered the subject last Saturday - and all the liberals were laughing at the black threats. Then conservatives on the show started laughing too. It was oddly insulting. They would NEVER laugh if Tea Party people made threats...
That's how black anger is seen. Impotent.
Now, get a Tea Party together - white men and women, black conservatives, intelligent young people - and there's a real threat.
Black radicals do their best to look threatening - guns, baseball bats, military type clothing - all for affect. With white Tea Party members it's to opposite. The men wearing light pastels shirts, shorts and women with soft make-up and appropriate earrings... And which group is more threatening? Trust me - the Tea Party people.
Go ahead, ZULU. MAKE MY DAY!!!
So now there are two organizations, consisting of protected group members, who are doing everything they can to destroy the United States and eliminate White Christians and Jews.
They benefit from lifetime protection from prosecution because they are not White Christians or Jews.
thank you
That won’t work
I look at things another way. They want to present blacks packaged as they did Obama : highly educated, smart, calm, wise, deep thinking, fair, above politics, all knowing, reflective... The Black Panthers is the exact opposite of what they want white voters to think of, as is Jesse Jackson. They don't want us to think of them when we get frustrated with Obama.
The liberal laughing act is just a excuse to refuse to cover them. In a way that defuses them too. If the BPs get no coverage, they are somewhat irrelevent.
Yes, if one white acted like the Bps it would be on the network news. Black CSPAN callers have been saying for a while that opposition and disapproval of Obama is racist.
The BlacKKK.
And those callers are ignored for many of the same reasons you stated above. A part of me feels sad that blacks are "blown off" so easily - it would be hard for me to be a member of a group that is so easily patronized ( as you explain) or just laughed at - my position. There's got to be a better way...
They say the same things on CSPAN that they tell me here in MD : Obama inherited a huge mess and it will take him eight years to dig us out of the hole, and if things get worse, as they are, that is all Bush’s fault too (forgetting the democrat congress 2007), that they would have been even worse without Obama, and if dont understand you are racists.
Not all democrats believe this tripe but this small core talk like they do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtJVPPi_iAk&feature=player_embedded
MSM where you at?
And the President of the United States...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.