Posted on 07/22/2010 5:43:50 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
15 or 16? Really? Impressive!
After Palin is elected POTUS you *15 or 16* (guess it depends on who does the counting, or if any of you can even count) can meet at a Shoney's and harken back to the days when you 'came this close to bringing Palin down!'.
Idiots
No Dum Dum....you can’t read either.
There are 15 or 16 Palinstinians, and the rest of us didn’t drink the Palinaid.
Way to ‘rationalize’ that one, too, Piss. Hunter is an embarrassment. Of course, part of the blame falls on you for giving him a pass.
BTW, he'll be voting for one of those milktoasts named Whitman, as I'm sure you'll be. So add Hunter to the list of uninformed (and passive) voters who vote for the (R) label.
Do you really think he has been banned or suspended?
To save us hassle and wear on our typing fingers, we should keep handy copy-pastes on file.
I have created a copy-paste of post 98 which clears up the matter of Palin ‘continuing’ to campaign for McCain, noting that the misinformation is being repeated by others. Onyx settles the matter. I did, however, clean it up a bit.
FRegards ....
Question:
Do you think if Reagan were President during Bush's last term, in 2008 America, given the past 20 years of this epic violent, out of control borders with millions pouring over the boarders, during war time, would have supported an amnesty, like Bush did in 2008?
This only requires a yes or no...
Lets see if you can be honest this time.
Ha! Nice!
Thanks for pointing that out.
Yes, Rasmussen has included questions about JD vs. McCain in a more general poll that I participated in early this week. (FINALLY I got to do that!) I've been waiting and watching for the results...
It's possible that the AZ part was an internal poll done by one of the candidates. JD really can't afford polling fees as he HAS TO commit his limited funds to ads, so I'm assuming that, if was internal, it was McCain's. If so, he didn't like the results or he would have splashed it everywhere. It's also possible that it's being conducted over more days and we'll see it pretty soon.
I forgot to add that when Sarah campaigned for McCain in March, JD Hayworth was NOT YET a candidate in the race.
His only competition at that time was Chris Simcox.
Obama: President of the United States
Oprah: most popular talk show host in country
Eminem: multi-platinum top recording artist.
As you can see, retards rule the roost.
My ‘rationalization’ is the truth. I can’t recall one peep out of Hunter regarding the CA governors race. Can you name another real conservative that gave a rosy rat’s ass about the two headed RINO?
He did, however, endorse the only conservative in the CA Senate race.
Remind me again who the Amnesty Airhead endorsed.
You know, that's not a bad idea, but will it really help? Many of these guys have been told the same things time and time again, yet they persist with their slanders.
There are those who are operating on hidden agendas. The truth means nothing to them.
Tell us all about your service, first. With units and dates, not vague generalities.
OK, FRiend. I’ll add it to the copy-paste. I take it that she never said a bad word about Hayworth?
Yes, a copy-paste debate point always makes your life easier, and it’s like carpet bombing the other side. You can always hone it over time. Just use it once on any given thread though [normally]. Maybe you could repeat a slice of it later on if need be. And you can refer to the post number.
Another thing about ongoing day-after-day debates. Please consider sharing this with other Palin defenders. Whenever a Palin basher ticks you off, you won’t be angered by much or for long if you channel that negative energy to positive use.
While angry, pray for guidance and line up Palin positive news that shows the good she does, shows the respect people are gaining for her, etc.
You could try a key word search, or refer to your research, and form a link list. Keep in on file and handy.
Then you can pop the offending person with good news about her — maybe three or four links. He retaliates, pop him with three or four more positive Palin links.
Their goal to bash her backfires. Once you have a routine in place, it’s easy. You can also track their posting history and Control + F[ind] “Palin”.
How you feature your comeback is up to you. No need to get too insulting — facts speak louder.
I take it that Hunter is openly opposed to Kagan? Excellent.
If Hunter also said something about the Ground Zero mosque, I’ll be doubly impressed:
Sarah Palin: An Intolerable Mistake on Hallowed Ground [Ground Zero Mosque]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2556262/posts
I don’t know, Arthur. I’m not that interested in creating a “comeback” macro to respond to the Palin haters. I just speak my mind, and hope that something I say reaches them.
Thank you for the suggestions, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.