Skip to comments.
Reports: Rangel Cuts Deal, Avoids Trial
WCBSTV ^
Posted on 07/29/2010 9:15:02 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: Sub-Driver
A slimy deal was inevitable. The slimeball Rats are panicked about what’s going to happen to them this November. No doubt they’ve brought in the big guns to force Charlie to heel: probably some really damaging pictures of him committing unspeakable acts and/or meaningful threats of DOJ prosecution along with actual jail time.
To: Sub-Driver
How transparent of them all!
42
posted on
07/29/2010 10:07:53 AM PDT
by
sappy
(criminallibs)
To: kabar
Of course. The Dems were NEVER going to let this play out in court, and Rangel knew it. I’m sure he was playing hardball.
43
posted on
07/29/2010 10:14:57 AM PDT
by
I still care
(I believe in the universality of freedom -George Bush, asked if he regrets going to war.)
To: Hoodat
"What about that trial?"
You won't find a jury in either his district or in DC which would covict him.
44
posted on
07/29/2010 10:15:07 AM PDT
by
wmileo
To: Mrs. B.S. Roberts
Told ya.
Rangel is slipperier than snake snot on a wet doorknob.
45
posted on
07/29/2010 10:18:22 AM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(A fearless person cannot be controlled.)
To: Fundamentally Fair
My Money is on the distinguished scumbag from the Keystone State, Charles Dent, Pennsylvania!!
46
posted on
07/29/2010 10:20:18 AM PDT
by
wmileo
To: Sub-Driver
Gee, I thought Charlie wanted the opportunity to have all the facts come out?
47
posted on
07/29/2010 10:24:13 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Puppage
At least he could have used a different line than Blago. I guess Dems are really lazy.
48
posted on
07/29/2010 10:29:34 AM PDT
by
CCGuy
(USAF (Ret.))
To: Sub-Driver
And....the Democrats breathe a sigh of relief.
Getting Charlie to shut up and leave the spotlight is what they want most.
They know this corrupt man jeopardizes all of their careers. The last thing they want is a public trial, exposing all of them.
49
posted on
07/29/2010 10:52:50 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: Sub-Driver
50
posted on
07/29/2010 11:02:15 AM PDT
by
RS_Rider
(I hate Illinois Nazis)
To: SkyPilot; ex-Texan
51
posted on
07/29/2010 11:02:33 AM PDT
by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is never "free")
To: Sub-Driver
52
posted on
07/29/2010 11:04:17 AM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Sub-Driver
A "deal" requires two parties.
Who exactly is the "other" party approving any deal?
WE NEED NAMES!
53
posted on
07/29/2010 12:16:05 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson