Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Obama Board Says Military Retirement “Unaffordable”
MOAA ^ | 8/12/10

Posted on 08/12/2010 7:59:31 AM PDT by pabianice

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last
To: nmh

The military doesn’t contribute to 0’s campaign fund.


21 posted on 08/12/2010 8:18:45 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

The military is a constitutional function of the government. O-hole hates the constitution, ergo, O-hole hates the military. That and he is a homo.


22 posted on 08/12/2010 8:20:47 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

The military is a constitutional function of the government. O-hole hates the constitution, ergo, O-hole hates the military. That and he is a homo.


23 posted on 08/12/2010 8:21:01 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I guess it isn’t enough to scrap my contractor job with USJFCOM; now he’s coming after military retirements.

Prick.


24 posted on 08/12/2010 8:23:10 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
I believe much of what the board is about to recommend is political and off base.

However, I have a close Air Force relative who served a tour in the Pentagon and came away completely disillusioned.

He said the waste, redundancy, over-staffed problems are great. But what bothered him most was the large number of civilian technicians and managers, so-called experts, whose opinions and decisions on critical matters were seriously skewed, not only on operational issues but on supply and logistics as well. He suggested it was a matter of the intellectual as opposed to the experienced.

I understand Rumsfelt was quietly working the problem trying not to make too many waves. Bureaucracy's are tough to clean up!!

25 posted on 08/12/2010 8:23:26 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

The biggest expense will be when they destroy the military. When this happens, we will all be in a world of hurt. As for our veterans, the government needs to take care of them no matter what. These people have done everything our country has asked of them. Even to the point of putting their lives on the line for them. How can we, the American people, turn our backs on them. Compared to the teachers and unions..........our military is far above them and deserve much more.


26 posted on 08/12/2010 8:25:20 AM PDT by RC2 (Remember who we are. "I am America")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edpc

As are Congressional and Federal employee pensions...


27 posted on 08/12/2010 8:25:45 AM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

bookmark


28 posted on 08/12/2010 8:28:41 AM PDT by NavVet ("You Lie!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

As are state/public workers pensions....as are union pensions....as indicated in this thread, a whole $hit load of them.....that is the next real bubble given the baby boomers getting ready to allegedly retire.

I concur with the other people here though: Why just the military pensions being targeted? Opps, my bad, I know why.... =.=


29 posted on 08/12/2010 8:29:23 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
FUB0
30 posted on 08/12/2010 8:30:34 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (Remember in November. Clean the house on Nov. 2. / Progressive is a PC word for liberal democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

To: SueRae

“The military is a constitutional function of the government. O-hole hates the constitution, ergo, O-hole hates the military. That and he is a homo.”

you forgot that is is a druggie too.


31 posted on 08/12/2010 8:30:39 AM PDT by Iron head mike (The government will soon make criminals of us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Y’know, if there IS actually going to be a civil war, ya really gotta love this. Its a great idea, worthy of the Romanovs. Push the military on to the side of the revolutionaries even before the shooting starts.

I think we're gettin’ close to end of that awkward stage Claire Wolfe mentioned. I'm glad I'm too old, too fat and too married to get mixed up in it.

32 posted on 08/12/2010 8:31:15 AM PDT by Little Ray (The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

“Let me ask this kinda dumb question...WHEN the pubs take over both houses can they retract all those FREAKIN bills? Of course that is if they find a spine to do it with cause you know the mediaWHORES will give them HELL at every turn calling them racists and sorts! Can they stop any bills the JOKER has signed from taking form yet? “
*************
***********************
Truth Is—nobody ever unscrews anything once screwed—dems, pubs, whatever—all just part of a two-headed coin—pick Mr/Ms Flim or Flam, but don’t expect any real difference—it ain’t coming.


33 posted on 08/12/2010 8:33:52 AM PDT by gunnyg (WE ARE BEHIND "ENEMY WITHIN" LINES, SURROUNDED, Our 'Novembers' Are Behind Us...If Ya Can "grok" it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

This from the administration that fairly quietly gutted most of the welfare reform provisions that had reduced welfare significantly. Easy to see where Obama’s priorities are.

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/02/How-President-Obamas-Budget-Will-Demolish-Welfare-Reform


34 posted on 08/12/2010 8:36:42 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Military pay and benefits are not affordable. The same is true for all government pay, which now includes many unions now subsidized by the federal government with borrowed dollars. We will stop living like we have unlimited resources and benevolence. Some choose frugality out of a sense of morality and responsibility, others have it thrust upon them in the name of survival. The thrust is underway.


35 posted on 08/12/2010 8:39:19 AM PDT by metalcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I have to say I agree with this- the days of “20 and out” should be LONG GONE

who in the private sector gets to work 20 years then retire? at age 38? with full pension?

And I mean ALL GOVERNMENT JOBS(state, local, federal- NOT just the military)


36 posted on 08/12/2010 8:42:16 AM PDT by Mr. K (Physically unable to proofreed (<---oops! see?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunnyg

Right ON!!!!!!!!!


37 posted on 08/12/2010 8:46:55 AM PDT by rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
I think the battle hasn't begun on this one. There's no way they're going to get this one by without knowing who they tangled with. There are a lot of vets and sympathetic families of vets who will get their reps on the right side of this. No one ever said anything about any “ifs” when I retired, as in “if we elect a communist enemy as president.” If this does manage to be implemented I will do every thing I can do cheat on every penny of taxes possible to even the score, the mothers.
38 posted on 08/12/2010 8:47:21 AM PDT by PeteePie (Righteousness exalts a nation, but sin is a reproach to any people - Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Food Stamps will never be cut.


39 posted on 08/12/2010 8:48:49 AM PDT by mortal19440
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

“Board members believe that avoiding a looming fiscal crisis will require cutting the Defense budget beyond Secretary Gates’ recently announced target of a $100-billion reduction in “overhead” spending.”

This is the perfect example of the cancer of government spending. How fast has it grown? Well, I’m glad you asked. The Secretary of Defense announced a target of $100 billion reduction of “overhead spending” in The Defense Budget. A reduction, mind you, of an amount equal to the entire federal budget during one year of Lyndon Johnson’s presidency. This nation had its first $100 billion dollar budget in the mid 1960’s and now just one department has enough money budgeted that it can consider the reduction of that same amount.

A cancer that spreads that fast is just as fatal to a nation is it is to humans.


40 posted on 08/12/2010 8:49:28 AM PDT by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson