Skip to comments.
Judge denies opening records of Obama -- could be an "embarrassment" to the president
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=198465 ^
Posted on 09/03/2010 5:05:10 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: cycle of discernment
jeez..title should read “Opening records of Obama”.....dyslexia attack!
To: cycle of discernment
3
posted on
09/03/2010 5:06:59 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
To: cycle of discernment
4
posted on
09/03/2010 5:07:03 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: cycle of discernment
> She said opening up such evidence could be
> an “embarrassment” to the president,
I musta missed something. The judiciary have no problems with evidence that may embarrass conservatives.
> and it’s up to Congress to call for impeachment of a
> sitting president.
Unless I misread the Constitution, the Judiciary participates in checking and balancing the Executive.
5
posted on
09/03/2010 5:08:32 AM PDT
by
Westbrook
(Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
To: cycle of discernment
Its about not Opening the records.
6
posted on
09/03/2010 5:09:36 AM PDT
by
dalebert
(true hillbilly)
To: cycle of discernment
That really begs the question.
7
posted on
09/03/2010 5:09:47 AM PDT
by
AU72
To: cycle of discernment
“...opening up such evidence could be an “embarrassment” to the president...”
Some animals are more equal than others.
To: cycle of discernment
No elected public official has a right to protection of embarrassment from the FACTS of their record.
These are NOT healthcare records.
BOGUS argument.
9
posted on
09/03/2010 5:11:27 AM PDT
by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur)
To: dalebert
What the judge is saying is that if you are a leftwing nut you are protected by the court and if you are conservative the court will hang you.
10
posted on
09/03/2010 5:11:31 AM PDT
by
dalebert
(true hillbilly)
To: cycle of discernment
and it's up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president.You can't call for an impeachment without some form of probable cause, which is being concealed by the judiciary.
This is just another political decision.
11
posted on
09/03/2010 5:11:39 AM PDT
by
paulycy
(Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
To: ozark hilljilly
12
posted on
09/03/2010 5:12:40 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(Political correctness in America today is a Rip Van Winkle acid trip.)
To: cycle of discernment
hey-c of d.....a half a cup o’joe later-and I didn’t even notice it!
13
posted on
09/03/2010 5:14:29 AM PDT
by
homegroan
(Proud member of the Hoi Polloi......ILLIGITIMA NON CARBORUNDUM..... -that's 4U Dad!))
To: cycle of discernment
“embarrassment to the president”
The exact WRONG thing to say
14
posted on
09/03/2010 5:16:32 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Diogenesis
15
posted on
09/03/2010 5:17:23 AM PDT
by
BobP
(The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
To: cycle of discernment
opening up such evidence could be an "embarrassment" to the president, and it's up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president. If he's not eligible, then he's not President so he cannot be impeached.
Whatever might the "judge" be thinking? I guess this "judge" never heard of a non-public examination of records as hard as it is to understand what might be embarrassing, it is even harder to understand what would be so embarrassing for her to examine the requested documents in camera.
ML/NJ
16
posted on
09/03/2010 5:18:00 AM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: cycle of discernment
If this flies does it give precedent to future Court Martial(s) seeing same defense? “releasing that evidence might embarass the General/Colonel/Major/Captain”, etc.
17
posted on
09/03/2010 5:18:34 AM PDT
by
Rebelbase
(Political correctness in America today is a Rip Van Winkle acid trip.)
To: cycle of discernment
Bring the Col. up on charges of obstructing justice.
18
posted on
09/03/2010 5:18:38 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: cycle of discernment
Interesting the Judge used the wording “potential embarrassment.”
19
posted on
09/03/2010 5:20:15 AM PDT
by
IamConservative
(Two wrongs don't make a right, but you might get even.)
To: cycle of discernment
It would be an embarrassment if the historic first black precedent in history turned out to be a complete and utter fraud.......
20
posted on
09/03/2010 5:23:01 AM PDT
by
usmcobra
(.Islam: providing Live Targets for United States Marines since 1786!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson