Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge denies opening records of Obama -- could be an "embarrassment" to the president
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=198465 ^

Posted on 09/03/2010 5:05:10 AM PDT by cycle of discernment

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

1 posted on 09/03/2010 5:05:14 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

jeez..title should read “Opening records of Obama”.....dyslexia attack!


2 posted on 09/03/2010 5:06:12 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
3 posted on 09/03/2010 5:06:59 AM PDT by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

4 posted on 09/03/2010 5:07:03 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

> She said opening up such evidence could be
> an “embarrassment” to the president,

I musta missed something. The judiciary have no problems with evidence that may embarrass conservatives.

> and it’s up to Congress to call for impeachment of a
> sitting president.

Unless I misread the Constitution, the Judiciary participates in checking and balancing the Executive.


5 posted on 09/03/2010 5:08:32 AM PDT by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Its about not Opening the records.


6 posted on 09/03/2010 5:09:36 AM PDT by dalebert (true hillbilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

That really begs the question.


7 posted on 09/03/2010 5:09:47 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

“...opening up such evidence could be an “embarrassment” to the president...”

Some animals are more equal than others.


8 posted on 09/03/2010 5:10:10 AM PDT by ozark hilljilly (Had enough, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

No elected public official has a right to protection of embarrassment from the FACTS of their record.

These are NOT healthcare records.

BOGUS argument.


9 posted on 09/03/2010 5:11:27 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

What the judge is saying is that if you are a leftwing nut you are protected by the court and if you are conservative the court will hang you.


10 posted on 09/03/2010 5:11:31 AM PDT by dalebert (true hillbilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
and it's up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president.

You can't call for an impeachment without some form of probable cause, which is being concealed by the judiciary.

This is just another political decision.

11 posted on 09/03/2010 5:11:39 AM PDT by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality: Islamo-Marxism is Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozark hilljilly

12 posted on 09/03/2010 5:12:40 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Political correctness in America today is a Rip Van Winkle acid trip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

hey-c of d.....a half a cup o’joe later-and I didn’t even notice it!


13 posted on 09/03/2010 5:14:29 AM PDT by homegroan (Proud member of the Hoi Polloi......ILLIGITIMA NON CARBORUNDUM..... -that's 4U Dad!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

“embarrassment to the president”

The exact WRONG thing to say


14 posted on 09/03/2010 5:16:32 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
IMPEACH-OBAMA-036
15 posted on 09/03/2010 5:17:23 AM PDT by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
opening up such evidence could be an "embarrassment" to the president, and it's up to Congress to call for impeachment of a sitting president.

If he's not eligible, then he's not President so he cannot be impeached.

Whatever might the "judge" be thinking? I guess this "judge" never heard of a non-public examination of records as hard as it is to understand what might be embarrassing, it is even harder to understand what would be so embarrassing for her to examine the requested documents in camera.

ML/NJ

16 posted on 09/03/2010 5:18:00 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

If this flies does it give precedent to future Court Martial(s) seeing same defense? “releasing that evidence might embarass the General/Colonel/Major/Captain”, etc.


17 posted on 09/03/2010 5:18:34 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Political correctness in America today is a Rip Van Winkle acid trip.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Bring the Col. up on charges of obstructing justice.


18 posted on 09/03/2010 5:18:38 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Interesting the Judge used the wording “potential embarrassment.”


19 posted on 09/03/2010 5:20:15 AM PDT by IamConservative (Two wrongs don't make a right, but you might get even.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

It would be an embarrassment if the historic first black precedent in history turned out to be a complete and utter fraud.......


20 posted on 09/03/2010 5:23:01 AM PDT by usmcobra (.Islam: providing Live Targets for United States Marines since 1786!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson