Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge denies opening records of Obama -- could be an "embarrassment" to the president
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=198465 ^

Posted on 09/03/2010 5:05:10 AM PDT by cycle of discernment

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: hennie pennie

-Do you happen to know if that hands in
that photoshop actually belong to BHO?-

I dunno, but those fingertips look pretty weird,
likely just reflection from the sun, bit it does
look as if the tips have been removed.

Is that what you were thinking? :)


61 posted on 09/03/2010 6:33:14 AM PDT by CaptainPhilFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

So the cover-up continues. All of the requested records must be so damning to The Chosen One that they would topple this well orchestrated fraud and put those responsible for it in prison for a very long time. Obama, Pelosy, and Reid would lead the way into Leavenworth or other penal facility.


62 posted on 09/03/2010 6:36:42 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (HEY, NAZI PELOUSY, ON NOVEMBER 2, WE WILL DRAIN THE SWAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Actually, I recall reading that zero’s lawyers privately met with SCOTUS and they had the same explanation - that the BC would be “embarrassing” to the president. Well, SO WHAT?

Because he’s lied like a rug and is a fraud and he’ll be embarrassed if we find out???

Obama didn’t care if Jack Ryan was embarrassed when zero got Ryan’s divorce records unsealed and he didn’t care if this damaged Ryan’s kids to know their dad supposedly wanted to go to a sex club in Paris. And, this had nothing to do with Ryan’s record in politics - it was low down dirty but it got zero what he wanted. Now we’re supposed to sit quietly by and say nothing about the fact that we could very well be paying for a fraud in power over our lives.

It should not be the business of the US government to keep zero from being embarrassed. Besides, he’s already embarrassed himself over and over..and the same for our country. He’s a walking embarrassment.


63 posted on 09/03/2010 6:38:05 AM PDT by Aria ( "The US republic will endure until Congress discovers it can bribe the public with the people's $.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

That’s a crazy decision clearly not based upon the law, but isn’t that verbage intended to be a backhand to the President? All of these appeals to unearth the BC are sound but we see that class or position has its privileges. This judge is the only one I’ve heard who has given the real reason no BC has ever been seen. And of course it’s a farce.


64 posted on 09/03/2010 6:39:28 AM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge

I think there’s no father listed on the original bc. O meets the natural born requirement with one parent on a technicality. No dad listed so no official foreign parent (if BHO I is his natural father).

No court today is going to hold that kids without fathers (sperm donot kids and kids whose moms can’t identify dad) can’t be President.
It would be racist, discrimnatory, etc.

No dad listed explains why judges, lawyers, and others who must know back away from this issue. They are not all part of a vast left wing conspiracy. It explains why Rush, Beck, etc. don’t touch the issue. We can’t win it and they would look bad embarassing O with “Who’s your daddy?”.


65 posted on 09/03/2010 6:43:12 AM PDT by Padams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
So the Army is more concerned about potentially embarrassing Obama than the life of one of their own and the rule of law.

Nice!

66 posted on 09/03/2010 6:44:25 AM PDT by Vision ("Did I not say to you that if you would believe, you would see the glory of God?" John 11:40)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Le Chien Rouge
His “grandpa” is his real daddy and his real “mommy” was a black whore.....that's the embarrassment. Everything about this guy has been a lie FROM THE START!
67 posted on 09/03/2010 6:44:35 AM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment
Don't believe everything you read at WND...Jusayin'


68 posted on 09/03/2010 7:07:24 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

With that twisted logic Judge Sirica would have dismissed the case against the Watergate 7.


69 posted on 09/03/2010 7:33:38 AM PDT by Truth is a Weapon (If I weren't afraid of the feds, I would refer to Obama as our "undocumented POTUS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Lind ruled that it was “not relevant”

Not relevant? Like hell it isn’t. As a soldier I think it is even more relevant than to the civilian community. As President he has the power to order us into harm’s way. I’m retiring but still have many soldiers who have my loyalty and I do not want that sack of crap getting any of them wounded or killed.

At my retirement ceremony, when the general gives me the certificate of appreciation signed by the president I will give it back.


70 posted on 09/03/2010 7:38:09 AM PDT by rfreedom4u ("A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
What kind of fool are you? Locked in a psych ward! That's JAIL.
71 posted on 09/03/2010 10:10:59 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
LTC Terry Lakin and Attorney Paul Jensen will be on the Barry Farber radio show tonight, Sept. 3, at 8PM EST.

http://beforeitsnews.com/story/160/991/LTC_Terry_Lakin_and_Attorney_Paul_Jensen_will_be_on_the_Barry_Farber_radio_show_tonight,_Sept._3,_at_8PM_EST..html

72 posted on 09/03/2010 12:48:44 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: rfreedom4u

0bama had no trouble finding a judge that would open the sealed divorce records of any opponent he faced in his political climb,

and no one seemed too damn worried about the “embarassment” that that caused.


73 posted on 09/03/2010 12:51:53 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: paulycy

God help us, lady justice has not only taken off the blindfold, she’s looking the other way carrying not scales but an open pocket book to collect all the bribe $$$$ coming her way.


74 posted on 09/03/2010 1:31:44 PM PDT by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Pardon me, but anybody who considers a psych ward to be JAIL, shouldn't throw around the epithet, "Fool!"

Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin, when not at work, is confined to a locked psych ward at Walter Reed Hospital, and while foolish idiots equate that to 'jail,' I believe the more apt comparison is that Lakin has been to the Gulag.

G U L A G .... not mere 'jail'....

Don't bother ever posting to me ever again, as I won't knowingly ever read any of your words.

75 posted on 09/03/2010 4:09:25 PM PDT by hennie pennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
A fool who leaps into an discussion to draw alarm to a distinction without a practical difference. Today's jails are psych wards, just as jails throughout history have been.

The criminal who needs confinement is often crazy. In today's US prisons

"there are 500,000 people with mental illness .. as compared to only one-fifth that number being helped in Psychiatric hospitals"

That the good man is locked up with the MOST crazy only makes it the more awful of a Jail for him.

Cite: The New Asylums: Hard Look at the Truth, a Documentary Review found via quick Google search.

---

JAILED! image from a Free Lt Colonel Larkin! Facebhook page.

76 posted on 09/03/2010 6:33:50 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: hennie pennie
A fool who leaps into an discussion to draw alarm to a distinction without a practical difference. Today's jails are psych wards, just as jails throughout history have been.

The criminal who needs confinement is often crazy. In today's US prisons

"there are 500,000 people with mental illness .. as compared to only one-fifth that number being helped in Psychiatric hospitals"

That the good man is locked up with the MOST crazy only makes it the more awful of a Jail for him.

Cite: The New Asylums: Hard Look at the Truth, a Documentary Review found via quick Google search.

---

JAILED! image from a Free Lt Colonel Larkin! Facebhook page.

77 posted on 09/03/2010 6:37:17 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Faith

Good point. The court in that case had no issues with causing “embarrassment” for Obama’s opponent. Now, the courts are really concerned about any embarrassment that might be caused for Obama. So if the embarrassment helps Obama, its okay, but if it (potentially) hurts him, well, we just won’t go there. So much for equal protection under the law. Sounds more like the law is there to protect Obama, but everyone else is on their own.


78 posted on 09/03/2010 7:08:31 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Faith

Good point. The court in that case had no issues with causing “embarrassment” for Obama’s opponent. Now, the courts are really concerned about any embarrassment that might be caused for Obama. So if the embarrassment helps Obama, its okay, but if it (potentially) hurts him, well, we just won’t go there. So much for equal protection under the law. Sounds more like the law is there to protect Obama, but everyone else is on their own.


79 posted on 09/03/2010 7:11:15 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: chimera

Sorry for the dual post. I’ve had to try everything three or four times. This thing is really, really hinky...


80 posted on 09/03/2010 7:15:06 PM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson