But all of this is academic, since, among other things, we have a pic that shows the plane flying inland from the west:
Posted on 12/12/2010 10:47:16 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
If you say so.
No, you say so. The only other possibility — assuming you buy the missile theory — is that it was the ChiComs. But in that case you’re back to the DoD keeping a lid on public knowledge, i.e. a conspiracy.
So which is it?
You are the one who is calling it a conspiracy because the DoD isn't giving an explanation of it. Was it a conspiracy when they denied the stealth bomber project even after it had become public knowledge?
~~~~~~~~
LOL!! TankerKC and I were reviewing our '60s USAF orders -- and finding lots of style errors in Mapes/Rather's "Bush documents"-- when Buckhead drove the stake through Rather & SeeBS by proving the docs were forged using MSWord.
Now, here I am again, trashing CBS (and the rest of the MSM) just like all 10-year FReepers -- and you claim someone hired me? ROFLOLOL!!!
Hired me to expose CBS Contrailgate -- (Real but Bogus)! And draw graphics explaining something we see every winter... <LOL!!!>
Hey, if you find them, make sure they pay me for my overtime, and nuisance pay for having to deal with idiots and psychotics, too!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!
And that goes for all the hundreds of my co-conspirators in the "Vast Contrail Conspiracy Cult", too... <chuckle...!>
~~~~~~~~
[CUE GRAPHIC: Septuagenerian, retiree Texan FReeper, in his recliner by the fireplace in the Texas boondocks -- about to shake his laptop off his lap -- laughing so hard he can't drink his cocoa...!]
But all of this is academic, since, among other things, we have a pic that shows the plane flying inland from the west:
TE, I must be having a good time tonight -- because that one-liner even got a chuckle out of me... '-)
Fortunately...I’m not going to let some Dweeb on a non-military forum usurp logic, science and military missile experience.
When people are making models of it and writing magazine articles about it?
I think you are overly infatuated with the word 'conspiracy' and you're applying it inappropriately. You want it to be both a pejorative pronoun and a subjunctive adjective simultaneously without differentiation.
Then you're having the right kind of time. ;-)
Non-military forum: FR. Non-military problem: MD-11. Fee triples for putting up with delusional jarheads...
These are trivial compared to the public safety implications of an unexplained missile launch off the coast of America's second most populous city. What an alarming sight for anyone who happened to look towards the sunset during those ten minutes or so. Don't you think the government owed the people of Los Angeles an explanation?
Except of course that it wasn't an alarming sight, since to most Angelenos the contrail looked exactly like what it actually was -- a typical contrail, the kind they see all the time off their coast. It was only for people within an extremely narrow viewing angle -- directly in front, where foreshortening might make it seem to travel upwards -- that it would have looked remotely interesting.
Nice avoid on the LAX webcam pic, btw. If you can't deal with it, just ignore it, right?
I have been shown that pic about twenty times and dealt with it as many times in the last seven weeks. If you don't like my answers that's your problem. How anal retentive can you possibly be to keep pinging me back to answer to you? What makes my opinion on it so important to you? If it is that important to you go read my posting history.
Your demand to answer it one more time sure isn't important to me.
whatever...thank you for your service but I think you and the other guy have a screw loose on this one! For some strange reason...
whatever...thank you for your service but I think you and the other guy have a screw loose on this one! For some strange reason...
whatever...thank you for your service but I think you and the other guy have a screw loose on this one! For some strange reason...
That's SOP for TE. Here's a classic example of his evasion by subject change:
To this total factual smackdown of his misrepresentation of my work he ignores his factual defeat (and certainly never apologizes for his erroneous slander).
Instead, he goes ad hominem with
"That's not true. You just can't be honest can you? Or reasonable or decent."
Nary an admission of -- or contrition for -- his indecent slander being proven flat-out wrong.
~~~~~~
As I said, evasion is his modus operandi and SOP. Simple fact. Count on it.
You’re full of it too. I’ve answered you over and over again. You’re just too neurotic to accept that not everyone agrees with you.
Not only are you too neurotic to let go of this you're liar. I actually cited you on that and pinged you to it so you have no excuse for not knowing it.
To: Ronald_Magnus; TXnMA; BradyLSYou do realize that TXnMA busted that pic as a crossfade aka crosswipe which is an editing tool used to transition smoothly between two separate pieces of video tape. What you see there is not two vortices from the two wings of an airplane it is two separate pics of the same plume overlaid one on the other like a double exposure.
You dealt with the LAX pic only weakly on the Glenn Beck thread. You raised doubts about the time stamp and suggested it showed another contrail or something.
Then I posted this... 
...where I circled the same pair of clouds in both pics, proving it's the same contrail.
I also commented that it showed the object traveling from west to east (consistent with a plane flying inland, and definitely NOT traveling vertically or to the northwest as the missile theorists claim).
You responded to me here, saying it didn't show an east-bound object. I then explained why it did -- the reasoning is very straightforward -- but you were unresponsive to it. Since then I've presented you with the same argument which you have continued to ignore, presumably because you have no answer to it.
You are also a liar. Here is my response. The very next post from yours.
There is no reason to believe or respond to people who lie time after time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
