Posted on 01/28/2011 2:04:22 PM PST by cycle of discernment
I agree his birth certificate is just the tip of the iceberg. Far more damning may well be information that he used his Indonesian passport to gain university admission and travel to Pakistan.
If you say it enough times it’ll make it true.
Could be a suicide bomber in the Hall of Records... what else?
The BC issue is getting some traction again.
All misdirection.
IMO the real concern of the administration is
a) Obama’s records from universities he attended, where he lied about his status to gain admission; or
b) Obama’s Indonesian passport.
You meant Soetoro, didn’t you? There are immigration records for a Barry Soetoro but the Dept. of Homeland Security won’t release them (a FOIA request was made and denied). Pamela Barnett briefly touched on this in her interview with Dr. Kate on Jan. 26th.
“I was blindsided by this,” he said.
http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/hawaiinews/20110127_health_nominee_pulls_out.html
I wasn’t aware that it was a fact he was born in Hawaii. What makes you think so? Have you seen any proof? Has anyone?
He does not qualify if his US citizenship was given up when he went to Indonesia. The treaty between the US and Indonesia did not allow dual citizenship and he could not attend school in Indonesia without Indonesian citizenship.
He could have regained his US citizenship within a limited time period after returning to the US, but did he?
Maybe that is why his college records are sealed. Did he go to college and to Pakistan as an Indonesian citizen???
hmmm
Source:
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llcg&fileName=071/llcg071.db&recNum=2
>! you have to turn to page 1291 !>
Bingham states: I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill],
which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution,
that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States
of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language
of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen
--John Bingham--, framer of the 14 amendment in the United States House on March 9, 1866
I can also post three American Presidents and THE Drafter /
signer of the of the declaration of independence saying the same.
(Not that it would matter to the global communists.)
In the bill that I recommend (at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/final-short-form-eligibility-bill1.pdf ), when a suit is filed over the eligibility issue, individuals would have the ability to file amicus briefs. So you would have the ability to present that evidence of the Founders’ intent if the state AG refused to do so. It would at least be heard. At least I hope I’m remembering correctly. lol. I’ve been looking at so many eligibility bills I’m forgetting which one is which.
The definition of NBC is ultimately going to come down to the swing vote at SCOTUS. If that person values the original intent of the Founders, those quotes you give will carry the day. If not, it’s anybody’s guess what they’ll come up with. Scary times that way. But we need a definition.
In the bill that I recommend (at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/final-short-form-eligibility-bill1.pdf ), when a suit is filed over the eligibility issue, individuals would have the ability to file amicus briefs. So you would have the ability to present that evidence of the Founders’ intent if the state AG refused to do so. It would at least be heard. At least I hope I’m remembering correctly. lol. I’ve been looking at so many eligibility bills I’m forgetting which one is which.
The definition of NBC is ultimately going to come down to the swing vote at SCOTUS. If that person values the original intent of the Founders, those quotes you give will carry the day. If not, it’s anybody’s guess what they’ll come up with. Scary times that way. But we need a definition.
“The simple fact of the matter is that Obama was born in Hawaii to an American mother.”
And the burden of proof for that lies where? And has that burden been met?
If not, why not?
The BC issue must be resolved. Having said that, we are just scratching the surface on what is the most elaborate communist scheme anyone can imagine, which has as its objective the collapse of the U.S. capitalistic system of government. It involves a 50 year conspiracy and unholy alliance of the CUSA, Muslim Middle East financiers, Black Nationalists, and New World Order globalists.
John Brennan is the sanitizer and the enforcer. Check out his background and you know why Obama brought him into the administration as the Deputy National Security Advisor. He meets with the prez every day.
Pamela Barnett suspects the guy sanitized SAD’s and Obama’s immigration/passport records, and was rewarded accordingly.
And the burden of proof for that lies where? And has that burden been met?
If not, why not?
________________________________________
Here is a man who met Barack Obama who told him he was born in Kenya !!! Read for yourself
http://state-of-the-nation.com/5581/man-met-barack-obama-told-born-kenya-read/
Given that it’s already been proven beyond any reasonable doubt, I think the issue is pretty much settled. Wouldn’t you agree? Of course not, because you have a political agenda that has nothing to do with honestly questioning Barack Obama’s policies and everything to do with advancing a ridiculous conspiracy theory that does nothing but make his critics look stupid and stubborn and Obama himself into a sympathetic figure.
Your idiotic handle “winoneforthegipper” is a transparent, overplayed concoction hatched by a troll, which you are.
The Obot Flying Monkey Cyber Squad is turning up the fan-out mole strategy again now that O’s cred is once again edging dangerously close to exposure with Abercrombie’s clumsiness.
Do not assume conservatives are anywhere as simple-minded as your left wing kin.
Your identity and purpose are painfully obvious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.