Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sex in space tough, says Nasa
Telegraph ^ | Valentine's Day, 2011 | Andy Bloxham

Posted on 02/14/2011 12:55:33 PM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: null and void; LibWhacker; Lazamataz

Heh! I can imagine...

“Open the pod bay door please, Hal.”


21 posted on 02/14/2011 1:04:48 PM PST by RandallFlagg (Let this chant follow BHO everywhere he goes: "You lie. You lie. You lie.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The article means to say that conception and pregnancy in space might be tough.

The sex itself might be unusual, but that is not discussed in the article.


22 posted on 02/14/2011 1:05:09 PM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void; Lazamataz

Laz has it all figured out. It involves bungie cords!


23 posted on 02/14/2011 1:05:30 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law
I anticipate problems with docking and reentry.

"US and Russian astronauts have had sex in space for separate research programmes on how human beings might survive years in orbit, according to a book published yesterday.

"Pierre Kohler, a respected French scientific writer, says in The Final Mission: Mir, The Human Adventure that the subject is taboo both at Nasa and at mission control in Moscow, but that cosmic couplings have taken place.

"'The issue of sex in space is a serious one,' he says. 'The experiments carried out so far relate to missions planned for married couples on the future International Space Station, the successor to Mir. Scientists need to know how far sexual relations are possible without gravity.'

"He cites a confidential Nasa report on a space shuttle mission in 1996. A project codenamed STS-XX was to explore sexual positions possible in a weightless atmosphere.

"Twenty positions were tested by computer simulation to obtain the best 10, he says. 'Two guinea pigs then tested them in real zero-gravity conditions. The results were videotaped but are considered so sensitive that even Nasa was only given a censored version.'

"Only four positions were found possible without 'mechanical assistance'. The other six needed a special elastic belt and inflatable tunnel, like an open-ended sleeping bag.

"Mr Kohler says: 'One of the principal findings was that the classic so-called missionary position, which is so easy on earth when gravity pushes one downwards, is simply not possible.'"

Source: The Guardian, Thursday 24 February 2000

24 posted on 02/14/2011 1:06:46 PM PST by jda ("Righteousness exalts a nation . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

I’m too old anyway.


25 posted on 02/14/2011 1:07:02 PM PST by donhunt (I am sick and tired of those bastards lying to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: goat granny

Never thought about velcro as a sexual aide but we may have to.

“Hooked, for her pleasure”


26 posted on 02/14/2011 1:07:17 PM PST by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kabar

“Deep space probe?”

Deep space nine!


27 posted on 02/14/2011 1:07:25 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

thats a LOL....


28 posted on 02/14/2011 1:08:59 PM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

tmi


29 posted on 02/14/2011 1:09:34 PM PST by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Velcro!!!!!


30 posted on 02/14/2011 1:10:05 PM PST by djf (Sometimes you are The Old Man and the Sea. But most times, you are the fish!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jda

“Only four positions were found possible...”

Find the right test subjects (who might not be found through typical NASA recruitment) and you’ll discover a lot more positions than that.


31 posted on 02/14/2011 1:10:54 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

There needs to be more experimentation on this. They should send me and eight score blonds and brunettes, all between sixteen and nineteen and a half, to space outpost Anthrax for further analysis.


32 posted on 02/14/2011 1:11:00 PM PST by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Try hispanic astronauts....they can do it.


33 posted on 02/14/2011 1:11:19 PM PST by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

There is an engineer out there who with the right
motivation WILL find an answer.

As far as reproduction, sperm and eggs may be frozen
and protected till the destination is reached.
As far as sex I would be willing to bet it’s
already happened.


34 posted on 02/14/2011 1:11:45 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Never thought about velcro as a sexual aide

Remember velcro is just a substitute for knots...


35 posted on 02/14/2011 1:14:53 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TonyInOhio
What we need is some lead underwear.

"My boys need a house!"


36 posted on 02/14/2011 1:14:53 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Tyrants flourish only when they achieve a standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed populace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Akin to trying it while standing up in a hammock. sd


37 posted on 02/14/2011 1:15:50 PM PST by shotdog (I love my country. It's our government I'm afraid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

I’m confused by the following, can’t we shield a spaceship from cosmic rays?


38 posted on 02/14/2011 1:16:43 PM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; Larry Lucido; Squantos

ya but you really could bring the term “Spinner” to a whole new level!!


39 posted on 02/14/2011 1:17:18 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Do cosmic rays turn your grapes to raisins?


40 posted on 02/14/2011 1:17:36 PM PST by Palmetto Patriot (Just exactly when is the next Election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson