Posted on 06/01/2011 3:39:43 AM PDT by SkyPilot
OK, FTA:
"Some say I should name and shame the doctor that refused to do the procedure. If I knew why he refused I might have done just that, but since I know that there are many possible reasons that he did not do it? I’ve left him to deal with the internal procedures in place.
Right there, ABW ran under her own goalposts. The story started out as
DOCTOR REFUSES TO PERFORM LIFE-SAVING ABORTION —
Religious reasons cited
but then suddenly became something quite different:
"Doctor Exercises Professional Discretion."
That is, "Dog bites man". No story after all.
True, this is not a "retraction" in the proper sense; it is, however, a self-immmolating admission against interest, which is the best one could hope for from such a source. Angry, "entitled" liberals are never wrong in their own eyes, so they don't see how their own words prove themselves wrong to everybody else.
Just name the hospital lady is all folks ask. My wife has miscarried too, I would never allow a doctor to let her bleed out as you have suggested. There is a difference all pro life people understand, we are for life, and the life of the mother is very important to us also.
And in a lot of cases of those on the left, redundant.
A horny male wearing beer goggles?
She is one of those coyote ugly women.
I work in the health arena and this woman is a liar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.