Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exposed: Ron Paul’s Foreign Policy Ignorance and Naivety
Pajamas Media ^ | 9-15-2011 | Raymond Ibrihim

Posted on 09/15/2011 10:03:56 AM PDT by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: dragnet2
And if we were never in Afghanistan we wouldn't have had the opportunity to “take out” Bin Lauden.

If the American people were as cowardly and ignorant as Ron Paul and his supporters we would have, as Osama expected, retreated from our involvement in the world rather than toppling the government that supported Osama, and occupying it militarily giving us the reach to take him out in Pakistan.

Luckily for the world the rest of the USA isn't as ignorant and cowardly as Ron Paul supporters.

21 posted on 09/15/2011 12:26:18 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: demshateGod

“Even if Paul is wrong on foreign policy, his philosophy makes a lot more sense than the neo-cons and liberals. The last 10 years should be proof enough for anyone.”

This is called a logical fallacy. Refer to Logic 101, freshman college level.


22 posted on 09/15/2011 12:36:00 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (.....A man eventually wears the face he earns.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Paulsen had a lot more going for him, at least he was funny.”

Pat Paulsen also had the best campaign slogan evah!

“WE CAN’T STAND PAT”


23 posted on 09/15/2011 12:40:26 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (.....A man eventually wears the face he earns.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

Ron Paul is not just wrong.

He’s certifiable.

100 percent Grad A loony bin.


24 posted on 09/15/2011 12:41:44 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Beware of PaulBots tearing down good conservatives - they are deceptive weasles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Ya don't need to occupy entire countries, for *years* or spend multiple trillions of American treasure, to take out Muslim gangsters. In fact, if those who created these destructive intrusive foreign policies, opted not to fight politically correct, "compassionate" wars, at the expense of American lives, we'd still have some respect in this world.

It was so bad, Bush's so called Homeland Security Chief Chertoff, had people wandering around the inside of his private residence, who entered the country illegally...All during wartime, while our own borders became a national security time bomb, with millions flooding into the U.S. illegally....during wartime. This is a farce.

We'll put you down for continuing these country killing, politically correct foreign policies.

25 posted on 09/15/2011 12:42:35 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
We may not need to, but it sure helps.

Good luck taking out Osama Bin Lauden when he is sheltered and protected by the Taliban and we have no military assets in theater.

According to the Paultard delusion all we need to “take out” Muslim gangster terrorists is to retreat, lick our wounds, and stop supporting Israel - and then the mean mean bad guys will just go away and stop hating us!

Talk about weak willed fuzzy thinking politically correct cycle of violence idiocy!

26 posted on 09/15/2011 12:46:58 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Our foreign policies worked out so well, while playing compassionate war with the Muslim gangs, your genius leaders decided to import tens of thousands of Muslims right into your back yard...

But that wasn't enough, so the just opened our borders during wartime, to a conga-line of millions, from God knows where, just to keep that great foreign police machine well oiled.

27 posted on 09/15/2011 12:52:29 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Was the US in its right to invade Afghanistan, in your opinion?


28 posted on 09/15/2011 12:56:24 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Beware of PaulBots tearing down good conservatives - they are deceptive weasles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
So a Ron Paul style surrender and retreat, and allowing terrorist veto power over our foreign policy MUST be the only alternative!

Like I said, good thing the rest of America isn't as cowardly as a typical Ron Paul supporter - Osama was really counting on us doing exactly what Ron Paul advises - retreat and stop supporting Israel.

Do you actually think that such a display of their power over us would reduce such terrorist attacks rather than showing just how well they worked in changing US policy more to their liking?

Not that I expect a rational response, but hey, stranger things have happened. :)

29 posted on 09/15/2011 12:59:12 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Was the US in its right to invade Afghanistan, in your opinion?

Yes it was, but to stay for *years*, costing trillions is not acceptable and should never have been an option or strategy. So bad, now their leaders in Jackassistan complain the billions we gave them, and or went missing, was not enough, and bitched they wanted dams and other infrastructure built. All while the U.S. goes belly up.

30 posted on 09/15/2011 1:03:43 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
The writer, not Dr. Paul, is the one confused. There are several different & distinct issues, here, which the writer has combined to make a point. But the point is not valid.

Let me respond with the piece I wrote in response to similar errors in President Bush's address on the 5th anniversary of 9/11/01: 'Clueless'--The Dangerous Intellectual Confusion Of A President.

While I am not in complete agreement with Dr. Paul on all aspects of foreign policy; even where we differ, I would acknowledge that his stands are carefully thought out. But my point, here, is not about Dr. Paul. The writer has lumped together a number of issues, that need to be analyzed separately.

William Flax

31 posted on 09/15/2011 1:11:09 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

Got breaking news for you, most Americans have had a belly full of compassionate wars, while spending the American treasure on foreign lands, while our own country and economy circle the GD drain.


32 posted on 09/15/2011 1:11:34 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

“Yes it was, but to stay for *years*, costing trillions is not acceptable and should never have been an option or strategy.”

So, you agree with US Foreign Policy in Afghanistan, you just disagree with the details of the strategy.


33 posted on 09/15/2011 1:21:28 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Beware of PaulBots tearing down good conservatives - they are deceptive weasles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Got breaking news for you champ, Ron Paul will never be the GOP nominee for President. He will never be President.

Americans are not cowards who allow terrorists a veto power over our foreign policy. Ron Paul is.


34 posted on 09/15/2011 1:29:04 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
So, you agree with US Foreign Policy in Afghanistan

No, I thought I made that clear. The devil is in the details.

In fact, I disagree with 95 percent of the destructive U.S. foreign policies.

We keep continue with these strategies and foreign policies, this country will not only go completely broke, but will likely end in a total collapse of our entire system.

35 posted on 09/15/2011 1:29:29 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

yeah, yeah, we get it...

America is bad.
NeoCons...
Int’l Bankers...
Jews...
Bilderbergs...

and Ron Paul the earmarks wonder can save us all...funny


36 posted on 09/15/2011 1:34:27 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Beware of PaulBots tearing down good conservatives - they are deceptive weasles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
So I like most others saw part of Sept. 11th attacks on TV, had the same initial reaction as most. You've heard people tell their reactions a million times no, need to rehash.

After the dust starts settling a few days later, the ID of the perpetrators comes to light, how they got here, how they stayed here, where they came from, etc. I start thinking "Wow, this is it, my country is about to come down hard on immigration. It's about to get serious. This is a huge deal".

"We're going to seal the borders, no more third-world backwards imports, no more Muslims coming by the thousands, mass revocation of visas, triple INS, Marshals, FBI, rounding up people en masse for deportation".

And I waited, and I waited, and I waited. And I thought "this is nuts, what the hell is going on? We're not going to do a thing meaningful. We went to war with Japan and even US citizens of Japanese descent had to go detainee camps, let alone non-citizen visitors. WTF!?"

Then we invaded Afghanistan. And still I thought sanity would come. Then the TSA. Borders wide freakin' open and I'm taking off my belt and grandma's getting a shakedown. Tens of thousands more Muslims pour in. Then tens of thousands more the next year. Handing out visas, green cards, citizenship day in, day out.

Then we're ramping up for war with Iraq. Same thing. By then we were even giving refugee status to people from the countries we were at war with. I'm out of my mind about it at this point. We don't even have candidates running for office that so much as mention curtailing legal immigration from Muslim nations, let alone revocation and deportation.

Then it hit me. There's something about our foreign policy that is way more than meets the eye. Don't know what it is, but, there's something sinister that we don't see. And you'll never convince me otherwise. I got eyes, and I can see what's going on.

Anybody else who doesn't see this is a fool.

37 posted on 09/15/2011 1:38:19 PM PDT by triumphant values
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

Border Security and Foreign policy are two distinct issues.

Conflating the issues doesn’t take away from the idiocy of Ron Paul.

But, but if Libertarians would have their way, they’d open up the Borders, hell they don’t even believe in borders.


38 posted on 09/15/2011 1:44:29 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Beware of PaulBots tearing down good conservatives - they are deceptive weasles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
I didn't mention Ron Paul or libertarianism at all.

Border Security and Foreign policy are two distinct issues.

Security is security. 90% of the people who read that post will get it. I'm not worried about the 10% who don't or the ones who get it and are dishonest about it.

39 posted on 09/15/2011 1:52:13 PM PDT by triumphant values
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: triumphant values

You made a ramble, not a point...lol.

...In a weak attempt to conflate the issues. Just because they are both relevant to national security, doesn’t mean they are the same issue.


40 posted on 09/15/2011 2:18:23 PM PDT by rbmillerjr (Beware of PaulBots tearing down good conservatives - they are deceptive weasles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson