Posted on 01/09/2012 1:12:37 PM PST by Kaslin
Thanks. I was thinking the same of you response in post 14.
Probably not, but only kooks and left wing nuts want to gut the US military, praise traitors, allow terrorists to get nukes, blame the US for 9/11, think there was “glee” in the Bush White House following 9/11, close all foreign US military bases, and trash the “provide for the common defense” phrase in the US Constitution.
Well I am inclined to agree with you here, obeying our Constitution is a very radical idea these days and yes neither Democrats or Republicans do that anymore. Maybe we should give the Constitution and personal liberty a try?
Wow you got your talking point lies down pat, nice job of mis characterizing just about everything Paul has ever said. You make a very fine slave, I bet your masters are proud of you.
But do you think a President should ask congress for a formal declaration of war before bombing another country like Iran or Libya?
Facts are stubborn things. You need to study up on Ron Paul. The only way he can keep support are from those who only spew out his one-line talking points and childish accusations.
The surrender monkey is an epic fail.
Sober up and smell the reality.
No. Do you believe a candidate should be elected to the office of President who want to gut the US military, praise traitors, allow terrorists to get nukes, blame the US for 9/11, think there was glee in the Bush White House following 9/11, close all foreign US military bases, and trash the provide for the common defense phrase in the US Constitution.
“I did not know anyone still took Rush seriously”
Who should be take seriously?
Ron Paul has as much in common with the Constitution as Fred Phelps has with the Bible.
Talk about cutting your PP off to spite your nads.
Hey, J. the evidence for everything Proud has said Paul has said has been posted dozens of times on FR. Do you needed it posted again?
Dec 9, 2011, Ron Paul said:
Think of what happened after 9/11, the minute before there was any assessment, there was glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq, and so the war drums beat,
I’m not going to vote for Paul.
But do you think a President should ask Congress for a formal declaration of war before bombing another country like Iran or Libya?
You said No. On this question I side with Paul. Enforcing UN resolutions does not cut it for me.
Bong Resin gums up the brain...
This really is a good highlight of one of the fundamental flaws of Paultardology. We are looking for a Commander in Chief of the United States Armed Forces, not an Aristotelian philosopher who will play moral equivalency games. The question should be simple, what is in our interest, period. Paul and his cam playing these games like 'well what if you were Iran, wouldn't you want one..yadda, yadda' is just philosophical coffee-shop talk.
No, no he lets ‘em babble for a while and then let’s em have it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.