Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elena Kagan: How Can Giving a Boatload of Money to Poor People be Unconstitutional?
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | March 30, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 03/30/2012 12:08:33 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last
To: justiceseeker93

This woman should be tried for treason instead of sitting on the Supreme Court. Bad people don’t last for long. I suspect she will be punished at the first opportunity. I am hoping George Soros will get his punishment soon.


81 posted on 03/30/2012 2:41:23 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus
Kagan is dumber than a box of rocks. My apologies to a box of rocks. How this woman ever became a SC judge mystifies me.

Because 5 Republicans voted to confirm her along with all but one Democrat, giving her 63 Yes votes. We could only afford to lose one Republican at that time if we wanted to filibuster her. And if the Democrats managed to get their one black sheep back in their court, we would have needed a complete Republican block to stop her.

Here's a good breakdown of how the votes on Kagan and Sotomayor went down:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/politics/kagan-confirmation-vote/

Here are the RINO bozos who voted for Kagan:

Collins, Susan M.
Graham, Lindsey O.
Gregg, Judd A.
Lugar, Richard G.
Snowe, Olympia J.

Those plus 4 more Republicans voted for Sotomayor.

There was just one Democrat (DINO?) who voted against Kagan. He did vote for Sotomayor.

Nelson, Earl B.

82 posted on 03/30/2012 2:50:27 PM PDT by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

Yes, it should be mandatory


83 posted on 03/30/2012 2:55:08 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This woman should have recused herself from this entire case.

Is there any legal remedy we can use against her for her not doing so?


84 posted on 03/30/2012 3:11:12 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I get he feeling that Kagan has been talking to obama since she got on t he bench and told him the vote today.

It’s outrageous that this woman is doing this case what is even more is that she does not even qualify for that position and has no clue about the laws or the constitution.


85 posted on 03/30/2012 3:23:31 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman,It's not a conservative view but a true American view)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

Exactly, where does she think this money comes from?


86 posted on 03/30/2012 3:29:21 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: manc

She is a stooge, a plant


87 posted on 03/30/2012 3:30:29 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

on that I have no doubt


88 posted on 03/30/2012 3:31:11 PM PDT by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman,It's not a conservative view but a true American view)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

She’s not just clueless, she’s a political animal. Not fit for our nation’s highest court.


89 posted on 03/30/2012 3:32:54 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This cow will probably be on the bench until she is in her 80’s or drops dead. I vote for ah, never mind..


90 posted on 03/30/2012 3:55:56 PM PDT by Leep (Enemy of the Statist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

this, from one of nine of the most brilliant legal minds in the country. has to make you wonder what the caliber of professors are at schools other than harvard, if she’s someone setting a standard.

we’re so screwed.


91 posted on 03/30/2012 3:58:17 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

She’s so smart, so wise, so intelligent, with such brilliance that it defies the imagination how she can stand her own perfection and superiority. How amazing and wonderful and great she is, so generous, kind and caring; amazing.

/SARCASM/


92 posted on 03/30/2012 4:04:56 PM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

Anyone here know if this woman can ever be removed due to her activism and basically being an idiot?
***********************************************
It’s a shame there are no cameras in the SC ,,, I would love to have a “blooper reel” of Kagan. Maybe John Roberts would OK a camera for just such a purpose... If we ever get to nominate another justice I would love for us to pick someone with a love for the country , common sense , high intelligence and NO LAW DEGREE ...


93 posted on 03/30/2012 4:10:19 PM PDT by Neidermeyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

The woman has zero conception...

Because the Feds can send a boatload of money every year.
A boatload this year.
A boatload next year.

Three years later, the Fed says “If you don’t do yada-yada, we’re not gonna send you a boatload this year!”

So now how do the states explain to their people that no boatload is coming this year? They don’t. They cave in to the Feds demands.


94 posted on 03/30/2012 4:17:54 PM PDT by djf (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: billorites

LEt me guess, these people did their thesis like a letter to Santa Claus: Dear Santa, we want free health care, and if the mean elves complain, just kill them.

There you go, mental age of a 5 year old on government power steroids.


95 posted on 03/30/2012 4:18:46 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Miss Kagan should be reminded that her lesbo sister Fluke just made unconstitutional for Catholics to give a boatload of money and care to people they chose to.


96 posted on 03/30/2012 4:21:23 PM PDT by JudgemAll (Democrats Fed. job-security Whorocracy & hate:hypocrites must be gay like us or be tested/crucified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest; vette6387; flat; unkus; JLAGRAYFOX; Clintonfatigued; ZULU; bevperl; IrishMike; ...

Everyone take note of the absolute silence out of the spineless, gutless eunuchs in Congress regarding Kagan’s not recusing herself. No outrage; gutless, chicken silence! The same silence out of the same gutless, spineless eunuchs in Congress on the question of Zero’s eligibility. Could we agree that the stench is worse than human waste?


97 posted on 03/30/2012 4:40:30 PM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Very frightening and likely quite representative of the elite’s cognitive abilities generally.


98 posted on 03/30/2012 4:45:03 PM PDT by Jay Santos CP ("Idiocracy"... It's no longer just a movie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Judicial Watch has pushed the issue. Congress has failed to press the issue, though. We can only hope that it has no impact on the final outcome.


99 posted on 03/30/2012 4:49:56 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead
Everyone take note of the absolute silence out of the spineless, gutless eunuchs in Congress regarding Kagan’s not recusing herself.

Several Texas Republican Congressmen (Gohmert, Hensarling, Barton, at least one other) have taken Kagan to task in interviews for her refusal to recuse herself.

At the same time, they admit that there is nothing that neither Congress -- nor the President, nor the court, nor anybody else -- can do about it. She is the sole determinant of her eligibility to hear the case.

And that's the end of that there story...

100 posted on 03/30/2012 4:54:34 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson