Posted on 06/01/2012 11:22:13 AM PDT by mnehring
Apparently Ron Paul thinks this should be legislated by the States.
That’s a nice Constitutional viewpoint on it’s surface.
However, abortion supporters know that many States will be very liberal in their permission of it if the Federal government completely abandons the issue and leaves it to the States to legislate.
So in practical terms, making abortion issue a States rights issue would result in an ever-expanding abortion business as women seeking abortions would flock to abortion-friendly States.
The founders clearly were of the mind that a moral populace was necessary for a good government, even if the government is a representative one.
Abortion supporters make the issue one about a “woman’s right to control her own body”.
However, since a child in the womb is not it’s mother’s body, as it has it’s own DNA from the moment of conception, the issue is really one of a “mother’s responsibility to her child in her womb”, i.e., she has a responsibility to protect and nurture her child - because her child is completely dependent on her for survival while the child is in the mother’s womb.
Of course, in practical terms, the mother’s primary responsibility is to simply not intentionally kill her own child in her womb.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.