Victims of Lance Armstrong's strong-arm tactics feel relief and vindication.....

nydailynews ^ | 1-2013 | By Teri Thompson , Nathaniel Vinton , Michael O'keeffe AND Christian Red

[discostu]

Time for them to start suing him for slander since his defense was always to accuse them of lying for financial gain. Turns out they were telling the truth, but the might as well the financial gain part.

[Resettozero]

Everytime I posted what a jerk he was and how he's not liked much in Austin, I got flamed. Geez, the horrible things they posted about his ex. Well, neener neener. No, I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for apologies.

Well, I'm not one of the FR posters who flamed you but I'm just coming around to understand that I've been wrongly persuaded by all the positive LA PR over the years. So, in case I might have taken up for Lance in the past, which I don't think I did, I apologize, theoretically. Is that a qualified apology or what!

[NormsRevenge]

Faust would laugh at this fool.

[bgill]

[Revolting cat!]

According to a long article in this morning’s WSJ, the SOB is still negotiating with the USADA to shorten his lifetime ban, so that he can participate in sanctioned triathlons. So far without success.

[bgill]

I’m just glad people are now seeing the real Strong Arm, uh, Armstrong.

[Revolting cat!]

Jeez, the crickets are so loud this afternoon that you can’t hear the choir of Lancey worshippers here apologizing for their past insults and abuses!

[FewsOrange]

[itsahoot]

No, I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for apologies.

This is not a forum known for apologies, ask anyone that did not faun over Mitt.

[Revolting cat!]

I figure the Lance worshippers are turning their worship toward the recently suicided “Internet activist”.