1 posted on
02/10/2013 5:15:48 AM PST by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: Kaslin
I always thought San Franciscoans were sack-religious.
32 posted on
02/10/2013 8:19:04 AM PST by
Chad N. Freud
(FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
To: Kaslin
San Francisco health officer Tomas Aragon reviewed Klick and Wright's paper and found “a biologically plausible hypothesis” but “sloppy” research. “It's a complicated topic. It's a little surprising that (they) would put this out there without a peer review,” he added.
You mean, like Manmade Global Warming?
33 posted on
02/10/2013 8:45:41 AM PST by
Chgogal
(Obama murdered the SEALs.They "were hung out to dry, basically exposed like a set of dog balls,...")
To: Kaslin; forester
We need to go back to paper. It is recyclable, biodegradable, and renewable. Moreover, we do need an economic reason to harvest more timber at a higher price simply because the selective logging we need to reduce overstocking costs more than clear cutting.
34 posted on
02/10/2013 10:03:41 AM PST by
Carry_Okie
(GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson