Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

So according to this Pentagon consultant, religious evangelism "… is sedition and treason."

 

Just.

 

Wow.

 

Honestly, I didn't think the country was going to be this far gone for another 4-5 years. This is fast.

1 posted on 04/30/2013 3:53:52 PM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: markomalley
We're supposed to be worried by statements from a person named MIKEY???!!!
44 posted on 05/01/2013 3:59:31 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
The Military Religious Freedom Foundation is calling on the Air Force to enforce a regulation that they believe calls for the court martial of any service member caught proselytizing.

Oh POOP!!!


45 posted on 05/01/2013 4:03:31 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Section 2.11 requires “government neutrality regarding religion.”

"You've come a long way; Baby!"



 
 
 
Mayflower Compact
 
In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are underwritten, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, defender of the Faith, etc.

Having undertaken, for the Glory of God, and advancements of the Christian faith and honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the Northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents, solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic; for our better ordering, and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony; unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.In witness whereof we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape Cod the 11th of November, in the year of the reign of our Sovereign Lord King James, of England, France, and Ireland, the eighteenth, and of Scotland the fifty-fourth, 1620.

 
 
 

46 posted on 05/01/2013 4:10:42 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

History is rolling up fast.

They have to get Christians out of the military in order for Satan’s worldwide kingdom to be realized.


59 posted on 05/01/2013 5:30:10 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; All

Do any of you remember Mr. Weinstein in conjunction with Christian evangelization issues at the USAFA a few years back, and probably more than just a few years?

I surmise that when you mix the rigorous military training with religious evangelization that people who aren’t interested in a particular religion would inevitably get insulted. But that’s par for the couse with respect to military training imo.

Imo military laws / regulations do not trump constitutional rights as Mr. Weinstein seems to be suggesting. After all, just like lawmakers are expected to make government policy which complies with the Constitution that they have sworn to protect and defend, it’s the job of military leaders to make military policy which likewise complies with the Constitution that they have sworn to defend. And religious expression is protected is a protected right whether Mr. Weinstein and our military leaders like it or not.

And as I mentioned in another thread, Congress is the only entity that can violate the 1st Amendment imo, by making laws which respect or prohibit religious expression.

On the other hand, when the courts apply Jefferson’s “wall of separation” to resolve religion-related issues as they are infamous for doing, they are not only wrongly legislating anti-religious expression “laws” from the bench in many cases, imo, but also likely ignoring 10A protected state power to address religious issues, power now reasonably limited by 14A. And they get away with doing so because the nation’s schools probably don’t go out of their way to to teach students the difference between legislative and judicial powers.


60 posted on 05/01/2013 10:54:31 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson