Holy Crap, this is outrageous....this could just explode now.
1 posted on
08/01/2013 2:16:11 PM PDT by
sunmars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
To: sunmars
Gee and golly news as it happend? So old, what does it matter four dead in a phony scandal??? gads
39 posted on
08/01/2013 2:48:04 PM PDT by
Karliner
( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28- 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
To: sunmars
It’s an onion...just keep peeling off layers.
But what difference does it make...she’s going to be President!
41 posted on
08/01/2013 2:49:51 PM PDT by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: sunmars
I myself got duped.. This story isn't even news. Most of us here thought there were 37 evacuees and 4 dead. What's the news?? That the 37 were CIA? Big deal!
CNN interviewed one of the attackers. This has nothing to do with what an attacker would know. This is a smokescreen, folks. This is not THE news.
To: sunmars; ADemocratNoMore; Akron Al; arbee4bush; agrace; ATOMIC_PUNK; Badeye; Bikers4Bush; ...
Ohio Ping
Video on the article page
CIA operatives are being subjected to threats via polygraph results of leaking information.
35 Americans were there that day
They mention the weapons running operation
To: sunmars; All
Modified, limited hangout.
47 posted on
08/01/2013 2:53:31 PM PDT by
pluvmantelo
(A Greenie is one distraught that somewhere, someone is living above subsistence level.)
To: sunmars
Why is CNN following this phony scandal?
49 posted on
08/01/2013 2:54:24 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
("When there is no penalty for failure, failures proliferate." George F. Will)
To: sunmars
Get a grip. It was an offensive video that caused the uproar, and nothing more. Jay Carney said so.
To: sunmars
Whenever the Regime whines about Snowden someone should ask about Benghazi because on that 9/11 national security was not a top priority.
55 posted on
08/01/2013 2:59:49 PM PDT by
RginTN
To: sunmars
>"any unauthorized CIA employee who leaks information could face the end of his or her career. "Or the start of a bright future as the next Libyan ambassador, maybe even Syrian!
57 posted on
08/01/2013 3:00:52 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(Jeremiah 50:32 "The arrogant one will stumble and fall With no one to raise him up; And I will set)
To: sunmars; All
58 posted on
08/01/2013 3:01:42 PM PDT by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: sunmars
It was weapons-running gone wrong that night for whatever reason and it involves high levels of the State Dept (Hillary), CIA and WH (Obama). Hillary and Obama would have rather let every one of those people die to cover up their operation than to save them and that’s why there was no urge to rescue anyone. They both had alot to lose if the weapons running were exposed immediately - Obama and the election - Hillary and her legacy and future ambition for the WH. It’s odd that all three people - Obama, Hillary and Panetta were in D.C. that night of the attack but none of them communicated or coordinated during the attack according to Panetta but were doing their own thing.
To: sunmars
61 posted on
08/01/2013 3:05:53 PM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: sunmars
Mark Levin is talking about this story now on his radio program.
FYI
62 posted on
08/01/2013 3:09:16 PM PDT by
TomGuy
(.)
To: sunmars
66 posted on
08/01/2013 3:18:18 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: sunmars
Why did Hillary and Obama use American taxpayer funded personnel, equipment and facilities to overthrow the government of Libya?
71 posted on
08/01/2013 3:25:51 PM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
73 posted on
08/01/2013 3:28:08 PM PDT by
Nachum
(The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
To: sunmars
Why did Hillary and Obama use taxpayer money to produce and distribute a commercial to the Middle East apologizing for that baloney video? They already knew that video had nothing to do with Benghazi. It was done to mislead American citizens.
76 posted on
08/01/2013 3:29:46 PM PDT by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: sunmars
what the hell was Obama up to???
That would certainly explain A LOT
80 posted on
08/01/2013 3:34:45 PM PDT by
Mr. K
(Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
To: sunmars
Programming note: Was there a political cover up surrounding the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans? Watch a CNN special investigation The Truth About Benghazi, Tuesday at 10 p.m. ET. Since this was published on 2013-08-01, I presume this means Tuesday, 2013-08-06.
I think I'll DVR it. It will be interesting to see if it is a whitewash.
82 posted on
08/01/2013 3:41:28 PM PDT by
justlurking
(tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
To: sunmars
Sources now tell CNN dozens of people working for the CIA were on the ground that night, and that the agency is going to great lengths to make sure whatever it was doing, remains a secret. I'm going out on a limb here but I'll bet they were selling (or giving) weapons they weren't suppose to have to groups that weren't suppose to get them.
A listening post was set up and we were spying for them - or with them - or on them - on Israel - or Hillary - on the Sauds - against all agreements with everyone we make agreements with...
We were lying to Peter to lie to Paul to make sure Almond bars were under the radar... and Paul was running underground secret prisons at night and training insurgents in the afternoon. Am I close?
83 posted on
08/01/2013 3:42:12 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(Sob stories make bad law...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson