Posted on 09/10/2013 6:52:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
It appears the Lord has given Dawkins over to his madness.
Wow. There’s a shocker.
Does the left ever think of anything other than their sexual perversions? These idiots are the lowest of low and less evolved than animals.
Obviously Mr. Dawkins didn’t pay attention when today’s liberals denounced our Founding Fathers for not following today’s politically correct standards.
Moral Relativism only works geographically and never temporally if the people in question are white....
I’m as confused by this article as Dawkins is about pedophiles.
He says he can’t criticize mild caning which is punishing a kid with a stick whipping
But the personal story he defends is a guy putting his hand in his pants. Big difference.
I figured you’d appreciate this news story...
While I agree with him that we should not judge past actions by today’s standards .... if you mess with my kids you disappear ... if you had messed with my dad’s kids, you would have disappeared ... if you had messed with either of my grandfather’s kids, you would have disappeared ....
I hope he commits mild suicide....
In Before An Atheist Posts Pictures Of Skulls Next To Each Other
I’m far from being a kid, but if this perv put his hand on my leg he’d draw back a nub.
That's not the part that needs to go.
I read this story. Very good. Sums up what’s wrong with half or more of our inhabitants.
Explains a lot actually.
“For each word or phrase in the left column, enter the VERY FIRST word or phrase that comes to your mind in the right column of the same line.”
mmm... okay. Let’s get on with it.
“Richard Dawkins” <=> “Aluminum baseball bat”
“Teeth” <=> “Aluminum baseball bat”
“Knees” <=> “Aluminum baseball bat”
“Gonads” <=> “Aluminum baseball bat”
“Ribs” <=> “Aluminum baseball bat”
----------------------------------------
I disagree - I'm a traditionalist.
I prefer the "crack" of a wooden bat, over the "tink" of an aluminum bat.
>> I prefer the “crack” of a wooden bat, over the “tink” of an aluminum bat.
Why can’t we have both?
Dawkins is spiritually dead. A cistern without living water. His conscience is stunted and befouled and his powers of reasoning disordered. He’s a moral imbecile who uses his disordered intellect to argue for evil.
I figured you'd appreciate his remarks.
“As long as she’s 13 and you only get her a little pregnant...” ~ Roman Polanski
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.