Judge Completely Trolls Justice Scalia In Striking Down Utah's Gay Marriage Ban

http://www.businessinsider.com ^ | December 20, 2013 | Brett LoGiurato

[FredZarguna]

It's not sophistry. His characterization is simply wrong. See my previous post.

[Sherman Logan]

Well, I guess we disagree on what the thread is about.

IMO it’s about judges deciding to write their own laws as they see fit. That’s a much more critical issue, to my mind, than what happened in one state some years back.

I would also suggest that your characterization of the Romney’s position on the issue is at least arguably quite unfair.

[Hostage]

> “All this started with Willard Mitt Romney Ordering
the clerks to obey HIM and violate the Mass. Constitution.”

That’s right.

And then there is the whole sordid saga of how the People of California passed a state constitutional amendment to define marriage as between one man and one woman, how it was upheld by the California Supreme Court and how it was struck down by a homosexual federal judge because of a lack of standing due to the deliberate non-participation of Governor Arnold Schwarzenneger and his Attorney General Jerry Brown, both of whom refused to defend the People’s Constitutional Amendment as it was their Oath to do.

The bottomline is that we have leadership that is rotten at the top, who do not respect the People ‘underneath’ them and who view their positions and offices as property to be bought and sold.

[NKP_Vet]

ANAL CANCER is 40 times higher in sodomite men than straight men. And let’s not forget Morton Downey Jr’s warning on AIDs.

“AIDs will be cured when certain men realize the anus is for exit not entry”.

99% of the women in this country that have came down with AIDs got it from a fag husband, who run off to sodomite his boyfriend, then come home and jumped in the bed with his wife. More proof that sodomy is nuture, not nature. No man or woman is born sodomite. None. Not the first one. It is a choice, and now the Federal government treats them like husband and wife. What a joke.

[fabian]

yeah..there are some very harsh times coming soon...

[NKP_Vet]

The people of California TWICE voted it down and it was passed because a queer judge wanted to “marry” his boyfriend and the US Supreme Court said that was fine with them. In otherwords judges rule this country, not the people.

[NonValueAdded]

Nailed it!

[PghBaldy]

You are right about Griswold v. CT.

[BuckeyeTexan]

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

[EternalVigilance]

Consequently, what the judge is saying is: "Scalia warned that Kennedy's opinion would be used by renegade judges to usurp the power of the People of the United States, and he was correct. I myself am one such outlaw."

Yep.

[1010RD]

There’s never been a law making one man, one woman marriage legal. It’s natural and precedes the state by eons. No law can make the unnatural natural.

[NKP_Vet]

Common sense has never worked with radical liberals.

[Cheerio]

Nothing has EVER prevented any person of homosexual inclinations from marrying. Only just not a person of the same sex.

AND one cannot marry your cousin, someone who is already married, your children, animals, etc. BUT once the gay mafia has destroyed the term marriage, then anything goes and the court cases will not even be able to be counted once these flood gates are opened.

GOD WILL HAVE THE LAST SAY ABOUT THESE PERVERTS NOW RUNNING THIS COUNTRY.

[MrB]

Utah should say “Sorry, Mr Judge, your one-man ruling does NOT overrule the judgment of 2/3 of the people of Utah. Pound sand.”