Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2010: Admiral: President Obama Gave Us Choice to Accept Gays in Military or Resign
Breitbart's Big Peace ^ | April 1, 2014 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 04/03/2014 12:20:40 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-319 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; ...

Active Duty ping.


201 posted on 04/03/2014 9:10:00 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

The graphic wasn’t directed to call you a traitor Snake Eater.

It is referring to the weak leaders at the top who would sell out their country to keep power or paycheck. Our guys at the top caved under immoral compromise. If they had been around during our nation’s founding, the temptation to turn to the British side would have been overwhelmingly tempting. Stand with the king and keep your land...

Strong uncompromising leadership presents a healthy fear which contributes to respect. Our nation is sowing its own moral destruction and it is heartrending to witness.

Thank you for your service. You are entitled to your opinion. But I disagree with it in regards to the compromised leadership at the top ranks who are contributing to the demise of the world’s finest military.


202 posted on 04/03/2014 9:10:28 AM PDT by 444Flyer (How long O LORD?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

No disputing that. You’d have had quite a unit if the sodomites were out-fornicating the heterosexuals. I don’t agree with the sexual element being on the combat team period, deviant or otherwise. This is the “Army we have” because the boys from the Rumsfeld family, the Romney family, the Burr family, etc. are too good to serve in uniform. Sadly we have gender integration, 1/3 of army enlisted females being unwed mothers, etc.


203 posted on 04/03/2014 9:13:51 AM PDT by MSF BU (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
That isn't very effective in a big war is it, in a blood filled environment, a periodic test revealing that carriers have only been passing it around for months, instead of for years.

I agree. Flag officers' and senior leaders' resignations wouldn't change this.

Homosexuality is weakening the military, what you don't see, is the accumulating effect of men not wanting to enlist, and not wanting to continue to serve in a gay/feminized military.

We older guys watch as the body blows come, one after the other, and we can see that they are slowly cutting off chunk after chunk of the meat, from America's ability to maintain a warrior class.

If I'm being completely honest, you older guys have a bit of a romanticized vision of the military. I've been in since before the GWOT and all the only real culture change I've seen is when we shifted from being a garrison military to a combat-focused military, and now we're going back to being a garrison military. That's a culture change nobody wants to see except for some real anal CSMs.

I have no doubt the policy change will have some effect on recruiting/retention, but also remember that we're kicking people out left and right as we've been directed to draw down. From that perspective, it's basically a good thing (though it will suck when it comes time to go to war again, but this is hardly a new challenge).

204 posted on 04/03/2014 9:15:22 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Added this to the second amendment list and Banglist. Similar tactics could be used to force officers to go along with gun control.


205 posted on 04/03/2014 9:15:33 AM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
"not wanting to continue to serve in a gay/feminized military"

...hit the nail on the head...

206 posted on 04/03/2014 9:15:48 AM PDT by MSF BU (n)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

I agree. While people are blaming the brass, the problem here is mostly cultural (that would be modern American culture) and the civilian leadership who issues these ridiculous orders via blackmail. Changing out the commanding general of a MACOM won’t have any effect on that. Changing out the president and congressional leaders absolutely will.


207 posted on 04/03/2014 9:18:45 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

“If I’m being completely honest, you older guys have a bit of a romanticized vision of the military. “

If by Romantic you mean “effective” then perhaps. Tell me why today’s military brass knows better about gays in the military than the man who first commanded it against the British.

Tell me how gays infecting the blood supply on a battlefield or a civilian hospital is not bad for either. Tell me who has enough integrity left to call it what it is in the military. Tell me why many good men and women have left. I know two MSgts that walked after long careers and their exemplary records no longer help mold young soldiers.

Tell me how that is not a bad thing that is a direct result of, not hate for gays, but lack of respect of a once functional system turned feelgood social experiment..


208 posted on 04/03/2014 9:23:08 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
I think you have your answer.

They will "follow orders", just like the guys we hung after World War II.

America, the Great Hypocrite & Police State.

209 posted on 04/03/2014 9:26:15 AM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Yup And they are just swell with it. they lack the ability to recognize the error in their thinking. God help them and us alike.


210 posted on 04/03/2014 9:30:21 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart
"...I’d have thought it was obvious..."

Well, the other side did their psyops work very well over the decades, brother.

They read us perfectly, and manipulated everything possible to achieve what we have and where we are.

When you devote entire university departments and curricula to undermining a society and don't give up, it works.

Likewise, when you are willing to fight back and defend your society - and do whatever is necessary to purge the subversive elements that are undermining it, you will keep it.

They undermined not only the majority's willingness to fight back, but the ability to even understand exactly what is going on.

Not saying they've won - they haven't - but they played it pretty damned and insidiously well.

211 posted on 04/03/2014 9:32:53 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

I must admit that I am glad you are not OK with our Fag-friendly policies of our military. I also can see that by not resigning one could work against the leftist scum infiltrating our once great fighting forces. I am good with that if that is the case.


212 posted on 04/03/2014 9:33:36 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

Completely agree. There is one hell of a case of category error underway on the right. For exactly the reasons toy described.


213 posted on 04/03/2014 9:36:37 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
I am afraid you are right. However, we are a rebellious lot by nature, which might “straighten” things out in the end.
214 posted on 04/03/2014 9:36:38 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: NFHale

typo hell...

For exactly the reasons “YOU” described.

I need sleep...


215 posted on 04/03/2014 9:38:33 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

RE Typo:

Hahah!! Don’t worry I got your point!!

I get fat-fingered too when I’m tired.


216 posted on 04/03/2014 9:41:32 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

No, we know things that you don’t know, we do not have a false memory of a military that you don’t know but think that you know better than us.

You also seem to be too young to remember a time when senior officers would resign out of honor and to make a public statement.

Frankly, you sound like the kind of modern American that fits in just fine with the current situation.


217 posted on 04/03/2014 9:49:30 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Libertarianism offers the transitory concepts and dialogue to move from conservatism, to liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Even when I was in boy scouts, we had two overtly feminine boys - who I did learn later on turned out to be gay when they grew up - and it was like pulling teeth to get them to do anything. “Go out and get wood for the fire” and they wouldn’t do it, they would get ticked off. I remember one of them almost got the whole troop sick because he filled the drinking water jug with lake water. Why? Because he was ticked off that it was his turn to go to the spring and just by chance one of the Scout masters saw him filling the container with lake water. So I see something like the Bradley Manning case, I know EXACTLY what the hell went on that guy. He went into a gay snit. I dealt with that crap for 30 years “bitch snits” they call them. They’re freakin’ drama queens. Women don’t act like that nor do lesbians, only gay men. Not ALL gay men, but enough where they should NOT be allowed in the military.


218 posted on 04/03/2014 9:51:55 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Republican has "I can" at the end. Democrat has "rat". Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

Reminicent of the Stalin officer purges of the late ‘30s. Some of the most talented officers in the Soviet Army were killed. It so weakened the Soviet Army that it was almost unable to stop the German Army in 1941.


219 posted on 04/03/2014 9:57:10 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
I responded, noting your disdain for libertarians is universal despite the topic.

It was on topic - noting your behavior here, is identical to other instances where we have crossed paths...nothing more -

I think you're reading a bit too much into it.

But at this point - I can pretty much surmise we'll see a post about Ft Hood (or something else) in which Libertarians are circuitously dragged into it, just to puff up your "brand"

220 posted on 04/03/2014 10:04:53 AM PDT by Revelation 911 (por que no musica?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-319 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson