Posted on 01/08/2015 5:43:05 PM PST by Kaslin
US troops kidnapping innocent Musloids and beheading them.
That is what happened, isn't it?
It wasn't just dressing them up in women's underwear and dog collars and taking embarrassing photos, was it?
It would be pretty lame if that's all it was.
Blame the New York Times for the twelve dead, as a result of sensationalizing the Abu Ghraib “torture”.
WHY MUSLIMS ARE VIOLENT
This is pretty straight forward folks. There are peaceful Muslims, but there is no such thing as peaceful Islam. Violence is not an aberration in Islam—it is DOCTRINE. Dozens of passages in the Quran exhort Muslims to hate or kill or terrorize infidels (non-Muslims) wherever they find them. For examples, see Suras 2:190-193, 2:216, 2:244, 3:56, 3:142, 3:151, 4:56, 4:74 (beheading), 4:76, 4:84, 4:89, 4:91, 4:95, 4:104, 5:51, 5:32-38, 7:96-99, 8:12-15 (beheading), 8:39, 8:57-60, 8:65-67, 9:5, 9:14, 9:20-30, 9:38-41, 9:73, 9:88, 9:111, 9:123, 17:16, 18:65-81, 21:44, 22:18-22, 25:52, 33:60-62, 47:3-4 (beheading), 47:35, 48:16-17, 48:29, 61:4, and 66:8-12. These are the passages that jihadists quote in defense of their horrible atrocities. Unlike the Old Testament, violence in the Quran is mostly open-ended, that is, not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding events.
While there are passages that Muslims point to that might suggest peaceful solutions (Suras 2:190, 2:256, 5:8, 5:28, 5:32, 8:61, 29:46, 41:34, 109:6), these are overwhelmed by the violent ones. Indeed, the peaceful passages were abrogated, i.e. superseded, by the violent ones—because the violent ones were written later, after Muhammad’s move to Medina (from Mecca). Anyone who wants to commit acts of violence has perfect justification for doing so from the Quran. There is nothing in the Quran comparable to Jesus’ teachings to “turn the other cheek” and to “love your neighbor.”
You can look these passages up for yourself. Below is a site that has three translations of the Quran side-by-side. (Note: English translators of the Quran sometimes try to soften the true Arabic meaning of some of these passages. For example, to “fight” really means to kill in Arabic.)
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran
In addition to the Quran are the hadiths. These are collections of sayings and actions of Muhammad. Indeed, Muhammad was one of the most violent men in history, setting the example for all Muslims to follow. See this link:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm
For more information, see our Faith Facts article:
http://www.faithfacts.org/world-religions-and-theology/christianity-vs.-islam
(If you like our site, tell your friends about us.)
We are still in a political correctness dungeon without light.
CNN was touting this today. Made me sick.
If Islam is a "religion of peace," then wouldn't it follow that
"Islam Extremists" would be extremely peaceful?
Just asking.
So should some French Christian decide to kill Muzzies for insulting Christ and Christianity after being radicalized by ISIS beheading women and children in the ME these same folks will no doubt be the first to provide a rationalization and defense.
I think one reason for this is the belief - secretly held among many of our ultra-wealthy betters - that the world would be a lot better off if about 90% of its current population were to somehow be induced to assume ambient temperature.
They see Islam as a sort of mass-administered post-partum abortifacient.
How it is they think they themselves won't be consumed, along with their families, is a mystery.
The Abu Ghraib fiasco was the first sign that Iraq was going to hell under Bush. It went from bad to worse.
But given that was a little over 10 years ago these claims sound a bit weak.
We got Obama for a long time now. He apologized for everything many times. Why don't they love us?,
“The left rushes to sympathize with Paris terrorist after he claims Abu Ghraib radicalized him”>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Tell it to the family of the unarmed French Police Officer who was shot in cold from behind while laying on the sidewalk with his hands in the air.
If a liberal can process that fact so visuaklly presented on video around the world, by this rationalization, I assure you that before a decade is out, they will have their throats slit like the bleating sheep they are , by those who they so insanely justify.
I will applaud that day. The fewer of them there will be , the better off the world will become.
From Emerson’s interview last night on Hannity:
“Sean Hannity: The next logical question then, Steve, is, okay, what about visas for people coming from Muslim countries? What about people that come to America that are Muslim? I’m sure the average American believes in freedom of religion, they don’t want to discriminate, they don’t want to be called Islamophobic, all of these things. How do you balance the two if people are coming from Muslim countries, how do you determine if they hold radical views, if they want sharia implemented in America like this guy Chaudary that I talked about?
Steve Emerson: Well you raise a very good question because that’s the role - you know there are DHS officers planted, placed overseas in US embassies in certain countries that have produced disproportionate numbers of terrorists like in Egypt or Saudi Arabia or elsewhere. Their role is to collect the intelligence on the visa applicants coming to the United States. The problem has been under this administration is that DHS has specifically instructed DHS agents overseas to basically not do their job, to not collect this intelligence. And when the intelligence has been collected, to show that the applicants coming to the United States with the visas in hand have radical backgrounds are either connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, connected to the Taliban, connected even [tangentially] to ISIS, they’ve been told to look away. I can tell you that personally. having had discussions with DHS officials and other agents from DHS who operate in an environment that’s Orwellian. And so you’re right, there’s a real problem here and our national security being violated.
Sean Hannity: Do you think France can get control of their country again and take over these no-go zones, stop sharia courts? I know prayer rugs are in just about every hotel if you go to Paris, according to a friend of mine who travels there quite often. Do they have the ability now to stop this, to say no you either assimilate or you have to go?
Steve Emerson: That’s a great question. I think they’ve reached critical mass, frankly. I’ve said this before, I think Europe is finished.
Sean Hannity: You think it’s finished? Well there’s a poll out there. One in six people in France actually support ISIS. Over 1,000 French have gone to join ISIS. So you’re saying you don’t think they can recover, that’s there’s too many radical Islamists that have taken over this portion of that country and it would be a war to take it back?
Steve Emerson: They [the European governments] wouldn’t take it back. They refuse to take it back. Sweden just engineered this artificial political coalition designed to stop any type of immigration prohibitions until the year 2022. So we’re talking about a situation throughout Europe where there’s a refusal to acknowledge the problem. And two, even if they did acknowledge the problem, what are they going to do if six to seven to eight to nine percent constitute a serious radical threat, not every single person but within that percentage, [there exist] no-go zones with sharia courts? Who are they hurting the most? They’re hurting Muslim women the most. They’re the ones who get subject to beatings, to death, to honor crimes.
Sean Hannity: So women who live in France are subject to sharia. They’re not subject to the laws of the country.”
Should’a let the dogs eat him.
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." Churchill had them read clearly.
Anyone who sympathizes with him deserves to be a terrorism victim themselves.
Even the Hot Air article says that the reference to Abu Ghraib was hearsay: an associate of Sharif Kouachi's recalled Kouachi purported statement. From the Hot Air article: " ...said Kouachi, according to an associate’s recollection."
This sounds like a made-up story by a friend of Kouachi's to create a narrative for use in Kouachi's defense or Taquiyya in Islam's defense.
This ruse appears to have worked.
.... AND Abu Graib was pretty much a media driven circus ..... That was very successful in getting out the anti American propaganda to the country as well as the rest of the world. The American media propaganda machine is very proud at how effective their movement was because they now know the thing they have dreamed of all of these years is now happening .... it's called the fall of America. And they cheer on .... whomever will yell their chant.
then using that logic its ok for Christians to be islamophobic and violent towards muslims since Mohammed the founder of islam slaughtered thousands of Christians...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.