Posted on 06/25/2015 7:22:53 PM PDT by rhema
Scalia really takes Roberts to the woodshed in his Dissent.
The system of checks and balances, so-called, is gone - as the SCOTUS has now become yet another gay Obama butt amusement.
Where does it stop?
The “living breathing constitution” interpretation of “intent” means goodbye second amendment, goodbye first amendment.
“Founders never intended for you to do anything except hunt or engage in sportsman activities with flintlocks...”
“Founders never intended you to challenge liberalism, even using their own words to show hypocrisy, lies, and false witness is wrong!”
How many legislators had to “intend” something in a piece of legislation?
If an aspect was discussed but not included in a bill because it wouldn’t pass, can it still be considered part of the intent and therefore a part of the law?
Does a majority have to have intended to include some provision? Simple majority? Two thirds majority?
Does the president’s intent in signing a bill overrule all other intents?
Do the intentions of subsequent legislators, presidents, and push poll surveys overrule the original sponsors’ intentions?
#DamnTheGodsInBlackDresses
bump
It is on tape the admin saying this was to make states set up exchanges otherwise theyd get no federal money. On purpose.
Scotus is lying.
I’d agree, but I wouldn’t want either of those lowlifes within 100 yards of me.
All the organs of government are lawless and irredeemably corrupt.
There is no political solution.
considering these dumb schmuck’s...so called decision on “gay” “marriage”....I dont think America will have time to wake up... before the curtain comes down!!
Screwed again, bend over!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.