Posted on 10/04/2015 7:55:56 AM PDT by DeathBeforeDishonor1
The author is basically saying, “If you take 3,000 victims off the list of people killed by Muslim extremists, more people were killed by white supremacists.”
This crap again?
this is confoosing...
Assuming Keisha is correct, it’s only because we haven’t let in enough of them yet. Look at what they’ve done around the world when they have sufficient numbers.
The Roseburg shooter had a white father and black mother, which - according to the standard racial classification system used by government - makes him black. He is black just like Obama is black. Yet the media have been calling him a “white supremacist.” I wonder how his crimes will be classified in official government statistics?
is this real?
“How about “since Sept 10 2001”? Would that skew the stats in any way? Hmmmmmmm? “
The bigger question is how many did they try to kill? The underwear bomber tried to take down a whole airplane. The guys after Pam Geller were out to kill a hundred.
Keisha leaves out that more people are killed by young black men in a month than have been killed by white supremacists in 20 years.
That Mercer fellow who singled out Christians at the Oregon Community College and killed them was a mixed race person akin to Obama and very sympathetic to Islam, mirroring Obama again. Perhaps that mass murderer was influenced by Obama’s vicious rhetoric against the Crusades; Easter; etc., while Obama was defending Isis and practically saying we’re no better than they are.
I think the press is just joyously lying, knowing their people are in power and perhaps will always stay in power (until the U.S. collapses into a pile of rubble).
Do her stats include murders by black supremacists?
Actually, I've never heard of her...and I'm pretty damned well read on the so-called "contributors" to the liberal cause...so what's her claim to fame?
More to the point...who gives a rat's ass?
Once again, the N.Y. Times manages to put the shine on my FR Tagline.
Once again, thanks guys.
But how about this-—
“New York Times: We print the news IF it fits our views.”
Even pretending that the NYT is technically correct and didn't bias their results, their conclusion is still that Muslims (less than 2% of the population) are responsible for a third of these mass killings. The relative incidence with Muslims is, in other words, sixteen times that of non-Muslims. Why should that reassure those who distrust "diversity"?
“Looks like Keisha is following orders, by dear Leader”
Well. since she’s a “Holder’s Person,” it only makes sense.
The New York Slime would never let the truth get in the way if its agenda, would it? Nah.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
