Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Smoking gun' emails just released by UK Daily Mail prove Hillary a bigger liar than Tony Blair
American Thinker ^ | 18 October 2015 | Thomas Lifson

Posted on 10/18/2015 10:06:33 AM PDT by GreyFriar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: GreyFriar
Why was Hillary saving documents from the G.W. Bush presidency written by SecState Powell on her private server?...for the same reason she got hold of a thousand FBI files "by mistake" when she and Billy first hit the White House - to mine them for possible damaging information to be used for future blackmail if needed - like getting the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to rewrite the Obamacare law rather than declaring it unconstitutional.....
41 posted on 10/18/2015 3:45:25 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The bottom line of the memo shows it to have been declassified on 1/23/2014.


42 posted on 10/18/2015 4:33:58 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Nope. That bottom line is Hillary’s email declassification date. In contrast, the top 2nd line shows 4/1/2012 as being Colin Powell’s original note’s declassification date.


43 posted on 10/18/2015 7:08:34 PM PDT by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Southack; GreyFriar
Then why does it say just to the right of that "declassify on: 04-01-2022.?"
It doesn't make sense to put that on a memo that has just been declassified.

As GreyFriar said in post #17...

Under EO-12958, “DECL: 04/01/12” meant that it would be reviewed for declassification on that date.

44 posted on 10/18/2015 7:46:47 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

OK. Thanks for that.


45 posted on 10/18/2015 7:56:02 PM PDT by Southack (The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Southack

I’m just trying to figure it out too.

If this was part of the State Dept. FOIA release I’ll keep a little hope alive that the FBI will find this much and more in her “deleted” emails. Perhaps a pattern of collecting archived documents for her personal use.

{cough}Sandy Burglar{cough}


46 posted on 10/18/2015 8:09:45 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye; Southack

Because that is the procedure in marking the document for the declassification review date. If the reviewer determines that there is no continuing reason to declassify the document, it is thus declassified on that date, which is 10 years after creation. Also EO 12958 was modified by Bush (13292) and Obama (13526).


47 posted on 10/19/2015 8:12:28 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

I’m confused again then. I’m not sure what question you’re answering since 2022 is 20 years after creation of the document.


48 posted on 10/19/2015 1:48:09 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

my apologies. I didn’t realize 2022 wasn’t a ‘typo’. However that date was established by the declassification reviewer who did the declassification with redactions to the document that is posted. thus in 2022, the redacted portions should be declassified.


49 posted on 10/19/2015 1:53:56 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Ahhhhh, OK. And that was done in 2012? 2014?

I appreciate the clarifications. This stuff is all Greek to me.


50 posted on 10/19/2015 2:09:33 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

It would have been done in 2014, but the EO is based upon ten year increments from the original classification date.


51 posted on 10/19/2015 3:29:19 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Thank you!


52 posted on 10/19/2015 4:12:09 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson