Seriously, anything that causes Hillary to lose out on the DEM nomination would be a good thing.Last time that was said, we got the Joker in the deck.
Posted on 12/23/2015 10:58:16 AM PST by Sybeck1
+1
With Carly’s record at HP and Lucent, I would put her in to clean out some government waste...close down a lot of people that don’t need to be working in the government....she’d be good at that position...
Look for Hillary’s VP pick. I’m sure it had to get the blessing of Obama.
***
Don’t you mean the blessings of Soros agent President Jarrett?
Seriously, anything that causes Hillary to lose out on the DEM nomination would be a good thing.Last time that was said, we got the Joker in the deck.
[If Obama is elected, powerful countervailing forces will oppose him and his own inexperience and probable incompetence will limit the damage. The President, alone, is not a dictator.]
Yes, said here on FR.
He will build one hell of a good cabinet.
I agree. She’s good at downsizing. She could gut the federal government and no one would ever know except the worthless over paid federal civil servants.
Both her and her crooked ass husband are in the late 60s, going on 80. Bill Clinton looks like he’s suffering from AIDs and the witch looks like a drunk who’s spent the majority of her life in the bottle. Her face has more lines and wrinkles than a well-used road map.
Hitlery is violating the Dem playcard, don’t discuss gun control until after being elected. 2000 election with Al Gore he lost Tennessee because of it. Why on earth is this fool running her gums about gun control at a time of economic instability, gov’t tyranny, terrorism, with the largest amount of firearms sold this year (after several years of breaking records) ever in US history??? Political suicide. It’s probably beltway ruling class delusion, believing the hack media’s portrayal that everyone wants sodomite “marriage” and “gender neutral bathrooms” and other holy issues in libby land.
Schlong the rug-muncher, 2016
Adding Carly to his ticket means the VP slot. I think that would be a big mistake for Trump. Then again, what do I know, I used to think Trump was crazy to even talk about running.
I can’t venture to name who he will actually even need on his ticket. Probably, naming a VP is a pain since TRUMP needs no hand holding and no politician.
He just needs no one.
He may or may not need someone electorally, but if I were throwing anything on the wall, I guess he could use another genius with chops in international relations, foreign policy, military strategy.
However, those kind of chops rather need to lead among his cabinet;Defense, State Department, Treasury, Justice.
No one is going to be in his cabinet he doesn’t trust explicitly, I believe that with certainty.
Also, we will be shocked by the exotic appointments he makes. Brains will be a prerequisite.
I totally agree with your suppositions and assessments. Trump can certainly get down in the weeds on any project, he’s got the executive skills to build the right teams to get the jobs done in the most effective manner at the least risk and lowest cost. Trust and brains are definitely prerequisites.
They’re concerned with degrading language while Trump receives multiple death threats from Democrats and key Republicans?
Controversy and allegations of steamy sexcapades, treasonous business scandals, illicit criminal activity, drug trafficking, and even a number of mysterious deaths has surrounded the Clinton duo for years.
Other than that, Hillary Rodham would be an excellent choice for president.
(That is if the urge to commit suicide still exists in the psyche of clueless American voters.)
Let’s see how much we here about Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky and I forget the name of the “Bimbo” he had an affair with in Arkansas while Governor.
Speaking of a war against women. How about the women and children killed at Waco when Jake Reno ordered her fascist thugs to kill everyone in that compound.
Jake Reno was an old lesbo buddy of Hill. Hill got Jake promoted to AG by the real woman abuser, her husband, the Wee Willie Woman abuser.
It is a little too early to spend a lot of effort putting Hillary in her place. That is for after the nomination is sewn up. Besides, we would not want to give the Dems an excuse for getting rid of her. An old, screeching, lying witch is a perfect foil for the campaign. Just not yet.
I don’t think the Republican candidate should start heavily on Hillary’s achilles heel that everyone knows she is a corrupt ethically challenged liar with a history of scandal. The 8 weeks before the general election should be wall to wall negative ads reminding voters of every scandal she has been the center of. The Republican candidate should turn it into a war on one woman who is particularly corrupt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.