Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rescue Interrupted (Benghazi, Attkisson, video)
Full Measure News ^ | January 10th 2016 | Sharyl Attkisson

Posted on 01/10/2016 8:49:59 PM PST by TigersEye

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: rodguy911

“Sec. Leon Panetta, knew of the Val_erie Jarrett orders as it was a DO NOT DISTURB NIGHT. That protocol has it’s connotations as Panetta has run into Obama on those nights and understands from previous encounters that attempting to interact with Obama on those occasions is a futile effort, because what was taking place on Benghazi Eve, was an Obama boys night in as has been posted on exclusively here.
Panetta is clueless as are the majority of the White House operatives in what is fully behind the Jarrett DND sign for Obama, but the context of what Panetta has encountered was a Birther Obama stoned out of his gourd and literally incapacitated.
The staff fully comprehends they are flying on their own on these DND nights.”

What a disgusting piece of crap the _resident is!


61 posted on 01/11/2016 2:48:05 PM PST by miserare ( "What difference does it make?"~~Benghazi Hil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
General Ham was in command until April 2013 so I don't think he was relieved of command Sept. 11, 2012.

General Carter F. Ham, Former Commander (March 2011 - April 2013)

He also spoke to Rep. Jason Chaffetz in Oct. 2012 about what happened, telling him he never got an order to send help, so I think he would have said something to Chaffetz about being relieved of command. That's far less damning than saying he didn't get a 'go' order.

Top AFRICOM Leader General Carter Ham Was Never Ordered to Save US Men in Benghazi Youtube video 1:42

62 posted on 01/11/2016 2:48:21 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut

Hillary’s pantsuit will be on fire forever in Hell.


63 posted on 01/11/2016 2:50:16 PM PST by miserare ( "What difference does it make?"~~Benghazi Hil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
See post #14 There is only one possible answer to your question.
64 posted on 01/11/2016 3:01:27 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: miserare

I like that thought :-)


65 posted on 01/11/2016 3:47:44 PM PST by Qiviut (In Islam you have to die for Allah. The God I worship died for me. [Franklin Graham])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Got a link to “Petreaus and all the other generals” denying this is true? Because if they denied a rescue team was ready and rearing to go, they are liars.

This is an in extremis situation with an ambassador unaccounted for... I know that there was an automatic response required for any 3-star and above [and that includes ambassadors]... so this would be automatic in Stevens’ case. We know the call went out- they couldn’t deny that because everyone gets that alarm. That means someone had to stop it... that someone has to be the president himself.
These teams and their support keep go-bags with them all the time. Some 3.5 hrs after getting the alarm, they’d be well along in the process.


66 posted on 01/11/2016 4:40:45 PM PST by piasa (uid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Ham would not have to be ordered to save the men at Benghazi...if he was in charge of in extremis response teams he’d have to be ordered not to, since response is automatic for an endangered 3-star or above including ambassadors. So he’s not exactly fibbing. I don’t know what he was in charge of though, since the admin claimed AFRICOM was skeletal.


67 posted on 01/11/2016 5:10:33 PM PST by piasa (uid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: piasa
......if he was in charge of in extremis response teams he'd have to be ordered not to, since response is automatic for an endangered 3-star or above including ambassadors. ...

I'm sorry, piasa, that is entirely false.

To: TigersEye; Qiviut
40 posted on 1/11/2016, 6:30:00 AM by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)

As for AFRICOM, it seems to be up and running as we type.

UNITED STATES AFRICA COMMAND

68 posted on 01/11/2016 5:21:00 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Ham was in the US when this went down.


69 posted on 01/11/2016 5:33:33 PM PST by piasa (uid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
The response is automatic. Everyone has to report in and get ready to go. That doesn't mean they wouldn't still need the CBA before they reach the border [or borders, depending on the location], but they would still respond, expecting to get the CBA from the WH as soon as State cleared up any border issues, esp. if friendly borders must be crossed- no need to risk taking on an air defense system if you can avoid it.

Not getting a CBA when you need it is, for all practical purposes, a forced stand down, but as explained to me it is not an order to go or to stand down, it is approval to cross a border. In Somalia Clinton would force recall of forces trying to nail Aidid even after the coastal waters were crossed, did he not? Obama avoids even that much responsibility.

It was the admin that claimed AFRICOM was skeletal [they used another term implying it was not fully functioning ]- that certainly wasn't the Bush admin's reported intent for that command and was news to me. The Obama admin also implied it was being run out of European command; if I come across the article I'll flag it. I took it to mean that Obama was at the time trying to shut it down to limit our military influence or soothe his antiwar base, as he's doing with the prison at Gitmo, but the events in Mali and the rise of Boko Haram and ISIS turning up in Libya likely prevented further nuetering.

70 posted on 01/11/2016 6:33:44 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Bttt!


71 posted on 01/11/2016 8:28:53 PM PST by Pagey (HELL is The 2nd Term of a POTUS who is a MALICIOUS DIVIDER of humans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa

You’re splitting hairs.


72 posted on 01/11/2016 8:37:41 PM PST by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

BOOKMARK


73 posted on 01/12/2016 12:40:58 PM PST by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyP

You are missing the point. the point is you don’t appoint a gay guy in an area where his life is always in jeopardy due to the idiots that surround him. It’s not at all about who he have sex with.


74 posted on 01/12/2016 3:28:48 PM PST by rodguy911 (Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Qiviut

Playing the I don’t recall game is always super slick only lawyers are good enough to do it3


75 posted on 01/12/2016 3:31:03 PM PST by rodguy911 (Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: miserare

It is hard to imagine just hard to imagine who’s running the country


76 posted on 01/12/2016 3:32:39 PM PST by rodguy911 (Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Benghazi has been the most difficult topic for me to cover of anything I’ve covered since 1972.
i continually get different answers on on just about everything I think that I’ve uncovered I get a different answer 6 months later six weeks later.it’s so frustrating. I really smell disinformation going on.otherwise there’s no way you would be getting so many answers for the same questions.


77 posted on 01/12/2016 3:39:16 PM PST by rodguy911 (Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Is it possible Gen. Ham took it on his own account to try and help the guys at Benghazi and then was stopped?


78 posted on 01/12/2016 3:41:06 PM PST by rodguy911 (Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Wow I had no idea!I was thinking he was in Africa. But even being in the US I’m guessing he had the best of information maybe even a live feed from the drone.


79 posted on 01/12/2016 3:44:12 PM PST by rodguy911 (Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: piasa

One of the links I read claimed that Obama had turned everything over to Panetta and one other guy and then took off and could not be found. if that’s possible if you could not be found to authorize cross-link then what happens!


80 posted on 01/12/2016 3:47:26 PM PST by rodguy911 (Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson