Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama Wants More Funds To Feed Low-Income Kids In Summer
npr ^ | 01/27/2016 | pam fessler

Posted on 01/27/2016 3:06:45 PM PST by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: BenLurkin

I wonder if obama know how many boxes of cereal, jars of peanut butter, loaves of bread and gallons of milk you can buy for $45

Someone should ask him


21 posted on 01/27/2016 4:32:55 PM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grams A

I don’t know how things work these days, but close to thirty years ago I knew some women on welfare. If you had at least one child under a certain age, you qualified for some benefit, for example a free apartment. So, if your youngest child is a year away from the deadline, you either get ready to start paying rent or you busy getting pregnant. I have, literally, heard women discuss getting pregnant to keep the benefits coming.


22 posted on 01/27/2016 4:37:55 PM PST by Darth Reardon (During the Great Depression, World War I was referred to as the Great War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
All this "starving" school kids stuff is a major scam. My hometown of La Crosse, Wis had some activist pleading for summer feeding programs for school kids. Because, you know, without the schools feeding some kids, they're going to starve to death.

None of these programs existed when I was growing up. But I went to Catholic schools 1-12. There was no food program for us. We all managed to not starve to death. BECAUSE OUR PARENTS FED US!!!!

23 posted on 01/27/2016 4:39:08 PM PST by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grams A

And, you answer your own question. Govt rewards those that are irresponsible, through pain of jail/destitution/death by stealing FROM the responsible...illegal, immoral and wholly unconstitutional.

The GOPe can’t even take a stab at any ONE of those reasons, for it would diminish the usurped power of govt and possibly begin taking down the house of cards (if they can’t to THAT, what else are they now getting away with?).

Low-info are much easier to rule over.

***

I got an easier answer to the problem, and the ‘food desert’ issue: Put their asses on the growing-field commune. You work, you get a piece of the results.

Plenty of OPEN space to use, container/vertical farming, etc. Costs are minimal (prep seeds).

Might even reduce crime. The manual labor so they could feed themselves would wear little thuggy out everyday. /s


24 posted on 01/27/2016 5:27:48 PM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The federales are constantly cooking up schemes to confiscate the earnings of taxpayers in order to hook more people on government dependence. We need a president who will veto these bills and drastically cut the size of the bureaucracy.


25 posted on 01/27/2016 6:32:28 PM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson