Donald Trump Has Less than 5% of the Delegates He Needs to Win the Nomination

RedState ^ | February 21, 2016 | Leon H. Wolf

[DoughtyOne]

I agree.

People want a fighter on their side.

They’re tired of the “NICE” Bush family, who didn’t turn things around.

Trump will. People know it. End of story.

We’re done with limp wristed pansy boys.

[Heart-Rest]

Losers In South Carolina
Cruz and Rubio got schlonged in the South Carolina primary.
All of the following people also got schlonged in the South Carolina primary.
Glenn Beck	Rush Limbaugh	Sean Hannity	Pope Francis
Senator Lindsey Graham	Governor Nikki Haley	Megyn Kelly	Mark Levin
Karl Rove	Steve Deace	James Dobson	Former Senator Rick Santorum
Wolf Blitzer	Erick Erickson	Leon Wolf	George Stephanopoulos
(Plus all the rest of the "neutral" debate moderators, the "National-Review-Twenty-Two", and the main stream media in general.)

[LS]

Ah, backtracking now. So you don’t ever say Cruz will win anything, just “imply” it. Got it.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

Leon is the go-to writer for every Trump hater here. Endless screeds, filled with idiocy. They make me laugh.

[bill1952]

That makes sense.
Makes those snowbirds good for something 😉

[Smokin' Joe]

Where is the link? If you can’t show it, I didn’t say it. No backtracking involved. Put up or shut up.

[LS]

You didn’t predict a Cruz win? Put up or shut up. So you didn’t have confidence in your candidate? After all that whining you NEVER thought he would win? Really? No up to you.

One way or another, either you are wrong or a hypocrite.

[Smokin' Joe]

How typical. You say I said something. I didn't, but say to provide a link to my statement you allege. Very simple. If I said it, you should be able to do that. None of my remarks have been removed from the forum.

You can't provide a link because I did not say what you said I did.

Very simple.

Because you made the allegation, the burden of proof rests with you, and you FAILED to provide it.

Now you are trying to twist this.

I saw the full court press attacks on Cruz from Iowa, from the moment he said he'd get rid of the money and mileage sucking ethanol mandate and the Governor there declared war on Cruz (He said he must be defeated, whatever it takes--maybe because his son is a lobbyist for the ethanol industry). Ever since then it has been "liar", and "greasy" and "dirty tricks" and even "Nixonian" and pure pages of the Alisnky playbook directed at Cruz.

Add in an open primary state where the Dems can vote for the crypto-liberal Trump, and frankly, no, I did not expect Cruz to win first place there.

I think those who built those expectations were either being unrealistic under the circumstances or trying to push that to demoralize supporters when it did not happen.

The polls showed Trump with a 2:1 advantage, so I expected Trump to place first. That Ted Cruz was a very close third is a respectable showing amid the media onslaught.

This is only the third primary, there are 47 more.

Maybe you would prefer Cruz drops out so when the GOPee and the Dems find the deal breaker for the Right vis-a-vis Trump, the only choice is the RINO.

Not me.

For the student of History, the Colonials lost a majority of battles and skirmishes during the Revolutionary war, especially those leading up to Yorktown.

It isn't over until it is over.

I am neither wrong not a hypocrite. I am realistic.

You, however are a liar. You have tried to dodge the fact that you have failed to provide proof of an allegation against me.

It should be out there for all to see, all you had to do was link it.

Instead of graciously admitting error, you try to attack me.

I can see why you support the candidate you support. Birds of a feather make guano together. Keep your chickensh*t allegations, liar.

[LS]

Long winded, but only a simple answer is required.

Did you or did you not say/think Cruz would win SC? Yes or no? If you didn’t, then you are a hypocrite because you come on here acting like you’re a huge Cruz supporter but have no faith in him. If you did, then you are simply wrong.

You could be a man and just say you were wrong. I think that is the lesser of the two evils here.

[Smokin' Joe]

False dichotomy, for starters. typical troll crap.

YOU SAID I SAID CRUZ WOULD WIN, I DIDN'T. YOU FAILED TO PRODUCE A LINK TO THAT STATEMENT.

Don't play word games with me, liar.

I already explained why I did not reasonably expect Cruz to win SC, I made no statement that he would. That one primary out of 50 is over. One battle in a long war. See you in the funnies, jerk. It ain't over until its over.

[LS]

Ok, so:

1) you didn’t expect Cruz to win.

(check)

2) Do you expect him to win in NV?

[Smokin' Joe]

Nevada is a state where there is a relatively small rural population overwhelmed by urban pockets. Gambling is legal, and in some counties, prostitution as well. He won’t be playing to the religious right, nor to urban conservatives. The SEIU will be out in force, and people who make their living off Casinos, the hospitality industry, are likely to vote for Trump. That leaves the Military personnel and rural contingent, who simply don’t have the numbers to overwhelm the former, even if they voted en bloc. I expect Trump will be first, I expect Cruz in second or third. That is simply realistic.

[Lurker]

I thought I waste only one who remembered Rockford John Anderson.

L