1 posted on
04/21/2016 10:32:44 AM PDT by
writer33
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: writer33
Glad I changed my tagline a few weeks ago.
31 posted on
04/21/2016 10:41:16 AM PDT by
goodwithagun
(March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
To: writer33
It's not even the general election yet. I was 100% positive Trump wouldn't slide to the left and align himself with Hillary until the general. I even underestimated Deceiving Donald.
Now I fear in the general election he will run to the LEFT of Hillary.
Wait till Hillary tears him up on the wall. He will abandon that quicker than you can say - WINNING. Here it comes.
33 posted on
04/21/2016 10:42:02 AM PDT by
builder
(I don't want a piece of someone else's pie)
To: writer33
There should be nothing at all interesting about this discussion. Any republican who would do something about this platform to stop abortion would be elected. After being pummeled much worse that trump ever thought of.
Any republican even remotely living up to this bs platform after election point him out
Abortion is legal. Even late term abortion. And after the baby parts sale expose in which in a free speech country the video maker is demonized
The republicans have done nothing to stop abortion but talk
Those who hope this trump statement will affect him can keep dreaming
35 posted on
04/21/2016 10:42:55 AM PDT by
stanne
To: writer33
If the right to life is denied, no other rights matter. Nor do walls, immigration policies, and taxes. Everything springs forth from the right to LIVE.
40 posted on
04/21/2016 10:45:02 AM PDT by
goodwithagun
(March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
To: writer33
Or just get rid of it altogether...
To: writer33
Trump is looking ahead to winning California. So now he espouses California values.
Then if in the general if he thinks he really could win california - he will abandon that entire messy “wall” business.
43 posted on
04/21/2016 10:45:29 AM PDT by
builder
(I don't want a piece of someone else's pie)
To: writer33
No, no, no, people......
You're looking at this all wrong. IT'S MUCH BETTER THAN HAVING HILLARY!!!!!
Haven't you gotten the directive from the site masters?
/s
46 posted on
04/21/2016 10:46:20 AM PDT by
edpc
(Wilby 2016)
To: writer33
Everyone knows this is Trump’s position. ( I agree with Trump on this) These two issues today is all Cruz has left to gin up voter turnout against the ‘satanic’ Trump...
50 posted on
04/21/2016 10:47:17 AM PDT by
BigEdLB
(Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
To: writer33
You’re seeing the True Trump™ today.
53 posted on
04/21/2016 10:48:02 AM PDT by
steve86
(Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OMorgair (Latin form: Malachy))
To: writer33
Kill the innocent for the crimes of another? If it’s a life then it should be protected. Trump seems to not be all that interested in protecting the weak an innocent, seems he might be more interested in having a really hot piece of a$$.
55 posted on
04/21/2016 10:48:36 AM PDT by
DaveyB
(Live free or die!)
To: writer33
Sensible position. Of course many here will scream that Trump is a liberal
57 posted on
04/21/2016 10:49:02 AM PDT by
usafa92
(Trump 2016 - Destroying the GOPe while Making America Great Again)
To: writer33
Trump is pulling the classic “Nixon”: Run right to win the primary and then run to the middle for the general.
Sorry Trumpkins. Enjoy your Romney 2.0.
To: writer33; onyx; Jane Long; PA Engineer; Grampa Dave; KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle; SaveFerris; ...
You're a busy little CruzBot today ain't ya?
___________________________________________________
Reagan made exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother
The Presidential Portfolio – Ronald Reagan by Lou Cannon
http://books.google.com/books?id=q3C7DjGP7BkC&pg=PA51&lpg=PA51&dq=lou+cannon+reagan+except+rape+incest+abortion&source=web&ots=x2M-6WWGGa&sig=68Gpimy11N1fHfvmWLbI4HgRMdY&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=2&ct=result
And Lou Cannon of all people, ought to know.
Sorry Trump-haters, festival is cancelled for this thread.
67 posted on
04/21/2016 10:50:59 AM PDT by
mkjessup
(If you stand with Cruz, you stand with the GOPe, Jeb, Mitt, iSnarly, Reince & Karl. What's that say?)
To: writer33
Some of us suggested there might be some buyers remorse after Trump got the nomination. We were derided as lyin, cheatin, nasty, scum.
But not to worry, at last we have secured tranny access to our daughter’s bathrooms.
74 posted on
04/21/2016 10:53:10 AM PDT by
DaxtonBrown
(wrote Harry Reid.s only biography www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
To: writer33
LOL!!!
Trump is on a roll!!!
What a loser.
75 posted on
04/21/2016 10:53:20 AM PDT by
plewis1250
(The pecking order: Christian, American, Conservative)
To: writer33
They should just change it to, “If it’s the woman who wants the abortion, that’s ok. She’s innocent. No harm no foul. Let her have it.”
77 posted on
04/21/2016 10:53:26 AM PDT by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: writer33
Ugh.
"... for rape, incest and the life of the mother."
How in the world does this justify murdering an unborn, innocent person?
78 posted on
04/21/2016 10:53:35 AM PDT by
grimalkin
(Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm. - Winston Churchill)
To: writer33
Ronald Reagan’s position had the same right?
To: writer33
So far today this has been Trump on the issues:
1) Pro-dudes in women’s restrooms with your wives, moms, sisters, and daughters.
2) Raise taxes on the “rich.”
3) Amend the GOP platform on abortion to be pro-killing.
Which party is he running for the nomination of again?
104 posted on
04/21/2016 11:00:56 AM PDT by
Lucky9teen
(God's blessing has been on America from the very beginning, and I believe God isn't done yet. TCruz)
To: writer33
It’s harmful to keep that language in the platform, because not only is there zero chance that a democratic process could ever lead to rape/incest abortions being banned, it can be used to attack Republicans EVEN THOUGH THERE’S NO CHANCE SUCH A LAW COULD EVER PASS.
105 posted on
04/21/2016 11:01:20 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Ryan never could have outfought Trump. I never knew, until this day, that it was Romney all along.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-115 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson