TRUMP CAMPAIGN PLANS COLLEGE OVERHAUL

Accuracy in Academia ^ | May 23, 2016 | Deborah Lambert

[papertyger]

I’m still not convinced that many of the conservative ideas that Trump has proposed are things he is serious about...

Good God, man! Just what he's put on the table so far rolls liberal presumptions back to pre-Carter levels!

He's already earned your vote ten times over.

[Political Junkie Too]

With no more classes to teach, these tenured teachers can be called Professor Dunsel.

-PJ

[papertyger]

Antonio Gramsci is lying in his grave holding his nut sack!

[papertyger]

Unbelievable! Surgical takedown! Awesome!

You know it's all a trick, right ;o)

[Anitius Severinus Boethius]

He’s said many, many things over the years. Always for his own advantage. I am not convinced that he means anything he says until I actually see action on it.

If you cry wolf for your entire professional life, expect some doubt when you say anything.

[papertyger]

If you cry wolf for your entire professional life, expect some doubt when you say anything.

Nonsense.

Pettifoggery.

Crying "wolf" when all levels of government are trying to blame missing livestock on "evil spirits" is a revolutionary act in and of itself.

[RFEngineer]

“ALLOW COLLEGE DEBT TO BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY.”

Exactly. Colleges will have skin in the game big time with that change. No bank will extend student loans unless they will be paid back. Market, meet reality.

[Anitius Severinus Boethius]

Too bad I can’t have a different opinion than you.

[papertyger]

“Opinion” and quasi-plausible caviling do not share the same pedigree.

[Anitius Severinus Boethius]

Perhaps I need to be sent for re-education, comrade.

[papertyger]

“RE-education?”

[Mad Dawgg]

Actually if you really want liberal heads to explode just take up Bernie's call for Free college only instead say we will just give everyone vouchers but we are going to do it for K-12 schools also.

Watch how fast the left would crush that program.

[Anitius Severinus Boethius]

What did I say that has caused you to respond to me 4 times? Let's examine that:

I’m still not convinced that many of the conservative ideas that Trump has proposed are things he is serious about, but if he can actually do this:

“A complete shift of the current federal student loan system to a market-based and market-driven system that would be run by private banks”

then he will have earned my vote ten times over

So I complemented Trump, and said that this proposal pleased me greatly, but this wasn't good enough for you, was it?

No, because I do not give him the 100% support that you think I should have, I am wrong. Not just wrong, but I can't even have my own opinion.

These are the tactics and behaviors of the Social Justice Warriors that have taken over U.S. Universities.

Even the slightest dissent will not be tolerated, even among those who agree with you.

[papertyger]

No, because I do not give him the 100% support that you think I should have, I am wrong.

No, I've responded to you four times because your "compliment" is "damning with faint praise." And even that is predicated on caviling more in keeping with "concern troll" ephemera.

Anyone who can not appreciate the magnitude of what's going on for "fear" of how it's going to turn out is watching the play facing the wrong direction.

[papertyger]

P.S. Am I supposed to leave your opinion unexamined just because it’s yours?

And you think I’M the one acting like a university “snowflake?”

[georgiarat]

No, they will no longer subsidize your wanting the degree or the college for offering it.

[Enchante]

except that such types are not even competent to be EPA regulators, since they (generally) know zero real science and have ingested all the politically correct slogans for years....

[Anitius Severinus Boethius]

Snowflake? No, you are acting like a SJW bully.

If someone doesn’t toe the line on every single item on your agenda, they are not correct.

This type of behavior is what has driven many, many freepers (and their dollars) away from Freerepublic.

Eating your own is not a way to encourage support.

[papertyger]

If someone doesn’t toe the line on every single item on your agenda, they are not correct.

So how about you quit whining about how you're being repressed for not endorsing "every single item," and tell us what items, and why, you disagree with instead of asserting the nebulous, obdurate "I don't think he can or will do 'X'."

THAT is what FR has always been about, not a passive-aggressive bitchfest with nothing but "he's out for himself" instead of substance.

[The_Media_never_lie]

“Philosophy and Sociology professors will be harmed by this plan”. I would be concerned about this, WHY?

You should actually be gleeful.