Skip to comments.
Ninth Circuit Court: No Second Amendment Right to Conceal a Firearm
PJ Media ^
| June 9, 2016
| Liz Sheld
Posted on 06/09/2016 8:54:06 AM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Not surprising since it's the 9th Circus Court.
1
posted on
06/09/2016 8:54:06 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
To: jazusamo
That’s funny...because the way I see it, the government doesn’t have the legal authority to prohibit you from carrying concealed.
2
posted on
06/09/2016 8:55:45 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: jazusamo
If the second amendment is judged as such then one would have no right to conceal money on one’s person either. or anything else.
3
posted on
06/09/2016 8:56:02 AM PDT
by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
To: jazusamo
9th Circus Court at it again.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL court decisions which this is, must be rejected and nullified by the states. The feds have NO constitutional authority to regulate your firearms. It is a STATES’ issue.
4
posted on
06/09/2016 8:56:33 AM PDT
by
Jim W N
To: jazusamo
People in Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Montana, and Nevada are going to love this. Headed right for SCOTUS.
5
posted on
06/09/2016 8:56:54 AM PDT
by
pabianice
(LINE)
To: jazusamo
The 2nd. didn’t disallow concealed weapons. There’s no mention of it therefor it should be taken for granted that if you’re allowed arms then concealing them is a given as well. And if it’s not mentioned then it’s allowed. Those Ninth Circus judges don’t know that the Constitution is for the people limiting government, not the other way round.
6
posted on
06/09/2016 8:56:58 AM PDT
by
SkyDancer
("They Say That Nobody's Perfect But Yet Here I Am")
To: jazusamo
7
posted on
06/09/2016 8:58:51 AM PDT
by
MichaelCorleone
(Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
To: jazusamo
,,,, and “ Shall Not Be Infringed “.
I rest my case . . .
8
posted on
06/09/2016 9:00:04 AM PDT
by
Lionheartusa1
()-: ISIS is Islam without the lipstick :-()
To: jazusamo
Don’t ask, Don’t tell.
Concealed means Concealed.
9
posted on
06/09/2016 9:00:06 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Avoiding the Truth-Hillary's only expertise)
To: jazusamo
San Francisco... who gives a damn what those biassed hateful judges think about anything?
10
posted on
06/09/2016 9:01:03 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
("DHS Quietly Moving, Releasing Vanloads of Illegal Aliens Away from Border"-where's ABC, CBS, CNN???)
To: BenLurkin
I agree. This decision still leaves it up to individual County Sheriff’s to decide what’s an acceptable reason but most Sheriff’s in CA won’t accept many reasons.
11
posted on
06/09/2016 9:01:41 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jazusamo
And if the election doesn’t do right (and maybe even if it does), this will result in a 4 - 4 decision in SCOTUS, as currently comprised. Disaster in the making.
12
posted on
06/09/2016 9:02:06 AM PDT
by
T-Bird45
(It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
To: BenLurkin
WHAT? You must have missed the post last week when hildabama said the govt has the “right” to regulate firearms. Coulda fooled me.
13
posted on
06/09/2016 9:02:24 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: jazusamo
Open carry now re-legalized in Kalifornia.
To: pabianice; jazusamo
That sound you hear is 1,000,000 Arizonans LMAO !
15
posted on
06/09/2016 9:02:51 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(My Batting Average( 1,000) since Nov 2014 (GOPe is that easy to read))
To: jazusamo
To: jazusamo
Ninth Circuit Court: No Second Amendment Right to Conceal a Firearm Not surprising since it's the 9th Circus Court.
My words EXACTLY!!!
17
posted on
06/09/2016 9:04:00 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
To: castlegreyskull
Article:
The en banc court stated that there may or may not be a Second Amendment right for a member of the general public to carry a firearm openly in public, but the Supreme Court has not answered that question.
18
posted on
06/09/2016 9:05:56 AM PDT
by
jazusamo
(Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: jazusamo
As a bear I take the right to bear arms seriously and think it ought not be infringed.
To: jazusamo
Are they trying to finesse Heller? Beware the unintended consequences, 9th Circus ... seems to me you just mandated Open Carry.
20
posted on
06/09/2016 9:08:04 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(JFK Wanted To Send Man To Moon - Obama Wants To Send Man To Ladies Room)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson