Posted on 07/06/2016 2:07:34 PM PDT by Olog-hai
HOR Republican committees.....where valid issues go to die.
Ryan showing he is a wimpy coward. He wouldn’t stand up to the guy, Obama, at any point during the last seven years, but now that a girl is involved he is showing how tough he is.
What a pussy.
The word: ‘look into’ yeah right...his head is so far up Barky’s butt he couldn’t ‘look into’ anything!!!
Existence of said agencies does not verify their constitutionality, either way.
Even the Treasury Department’s constitutionality is not established. The power to “coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin” is given to Congress by the Constitution, not the executive branch; “delegating” that power to the executive branch is a deliberate destruction of the separation of powers, even from the establishment of the USA.
What a crock of $hit. He won’t do any. He and the establishment re-poop-licans won’t cause anything to happen to poor miss hitlery. They’ll look into it? Sure!!!!!
PS. That is a circular argument that does not explain the constitutionality thereof, with all due respect.
Bill Clinton overhauled the rules regarding security clearances. The president is the decider as to who has to have one and drafted the process for getting one.
`We will go to great lengths to see if we can get Clinton to agree to ... ‘ Paul Ryno, on the same page with Obama
This is show-boating stupidity.
As in Trey Gowdy, Darryl Issa, Bonehead Boehner, and on and on....Cantorize Lyin’ Ryan. Go Nehlen! http://www.paulnehlen.com/
IF CONGRESS HAD ANY CAJONES THEY WOULD IMMEDIATELY JAIL HILLARY FOR PERJURY!
They have the authority and the proof in Comey’s list of each item where she perjured herself in her testimony before Congress while under oath.
Ryan and Congress won’t do anything......
“Existence of said agencies does not verify their constitutionality, either way.”
So what? Do you want to ask whether Congress has control over internal Executive branch designations? Or do you want to ask whether the executive agencies are all “constitutional”? Because those are two entirely different questions. I’ve answered the first one, not the second.
I think it’s a fair question. Too many people are saying “so what” to rule of law these days.
This is what is known as “lip service”.
Ryan is all talk except when it comes to delivering for the donor class.
Trump should videotape the meeting where the Government explains security process and policies for confidentential information.
Then add a laugh track, and post to youtube
“Whether?” ... DO it Ryan!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.