Posted on 08/26/2016 9:45:54 AM PDT by detective
She did try to fight back and he bit her lip to control her. He didn’t let go until he was finished and then said ‘better put some ice on that’. Yes, back in the 70’s Broaddrick would have been blamed. She thought that since he was Atty General, it would be safe to meet him in the hotel room. She was wrong and has suffered the slings and arrows of the Libs since coming out with the truth in the late 90’s. Find her interview with Lisa Myers, formerly of NBC, and watch that interview. Then let us know if you have changed tyour mind.
Juanita Broderick made the right decision. If she had reported Governor Clinton to the Arkansas police back when it happened she would be dead and no one would have heard of her.
Learn a little bit about the trail of dead bodies the Clintons left behind.
Name a single person from back then who made charges against Clinton to authorities who is still alive.
Well she made her decision back then and then changed her mind much too late to stop him back during his presidency. To bring it up again now 20 years after it was first reported is not going to help anyone except the Clintons.
They will simply point to her story and claim once again that the vast right wing is trying to discredit them using an old story that most of the public didn't believe back in the 90's. So excuse me if I find that her coming forward again now hurts our cause and helps Hillary.
I despise the Clintons and feel that they both should be in Leavenworth.
Whatever she does, just don’t let that life insurance policy lapse.
She would have been savaged.
And abused all over again by the court.
And very probably Vince Fostered.
One more example of just how much Hillary supports women.
The term “arkancide” is being resurrected after not hearing it used for years.
More like a life ending pay day, just like Vince Foster.
Bill Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick says she is selling her house because she fears for her life.
Bill Clinton TWO TIME RAPE VICTIM Juanita Broaddrick says she is selling her house because she fears for her life.
I am not going to condemn a victimized woman for not aggressively and immediately going public who had already been physically attacked by a politically powerful man, thus proving to her that he was ruthless and would do as he wanted with and to her.
The Clintons are masters of intimidation.
She was foolish to meet him alone, but again, he was a powerful man, and presumably one who held the public trust.
You don’t know what you would do or would have done. You are ignorant about the subject. But it did not prevent you from opening your loud mouth about what actual victims of rape and political corruption should have done differently. A wise person would realize by this point that attacking the victim is a mistake, but I won’t hold my breath waiting for you to retract your foolish comments.
btt
“What do you think will happen if she loses?”
That’s a REALLY good question. If I were her Campaign Manager, I’d be interviewing body guards at this very moment.
I don’t think you read or interpreted my post correctly. I am in agreement with you.
What I said was, I agree with that it would have been a good thing for her to report (and, as I said, a courageous thing for her to do) but I support her decision completely. Did you read my post some other way?
I have to separate those two things and support her decision. You and I will have to disagree on that.
Where we do agree is that we despise them both, and wish to see them in Leavenworth.
“I don’t think you read or interpreted my post correctly. I am in agreement with you.
What I said was, I agree with that it would have been a good thing for her to report (and, as I said, a courageous thing for her to do) but I support her decision completely. Did you read my post some other way?”
I said that she made the right decision. I don’t think it would have been good or courageous as you said to report Governor Clinton to the Arkansas police.
She and her family probably would have been killed and no action would have been taken against Clinton.
I think we basically agree on everything.
Thanks for the insults.
I didn't attack the victim. Her story was believable to me and I do believe she was raped.
I said that she had a duty to report the crime. There are countless rapists in jail even back in the 70's from crimes where the women reported the crime. And there have been many political careers ruined by the public being aware of an affair much less rape.
My point was she had her chance and coming forward now does nothing to help rape victims, but it does give Hillary an out to claim it's just an old discredited story by the vast right wing conspiracy.
If you really look at it, the Krintons are perfect rulers for the impending New Feudalism.
She'd probably be dead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.