I wonder if this new material is election-related, or foundation-related?
The "mother lode" would be a smoking gun proving pay-to-play -- i.e. internal communications from a foundation donor discussing why they got in return for a "donation".
How the FBI Went Easy on Hillary Clinton
Published September 9, 2016
By Paul Sperry, The New York Post
It’s clear now the FBI conducted a sweetheart investigation into Hillary Clinton’s e-mail shenanigans that appears to have been fixed from the start to go nowhere.
Far from exonerating Clinton, the nearly 60 pages of documents expose both the systematic destruction of subpoenaed evidence by Clinton’s aides and the curious lack of interest by investigators in recovering it.
Agents also failed to resolve unanswered questions, reconcile contradictory testimony or sweat uncooperative witnesses.
Comey declared the investigation free of undue influence three days after his agents interviewed Clinton at FBI headquarters under special terms. Agents weren’t allowed to Mirandize Clinton or place her under oath, even though she was the subject of a criminal investigation possibly involving espionage. They weren’t even allowed to record her answers.
What’s more, Comey made the two FBI agents who interviewed Clinton — along with all agents and forensic analysts involved in the so-called investigation — sign non-disclosure agreements gagging them from talking about the case even with other employees.
Comey even let Clinton’s State Department aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson sit in on the interview with Clinton’s other lawyers, despite the glaring conflict of interest. FBI documents make clear Mills and Samuelson led the effort to search and destroy Clinton’s subpoenaed e-mails and should’ve been prime targets of the investigation.
Comey didn’t even attend her interview and, per his testimony, only read a “summary” of it.
The FBI failed to pursue even the most basic lines of questioning. When Clinton pleaded ignorance about basic classification symbols, agents could’ve produced the State documents she signed acknowledging she was briefed about how to ID and handle classified information at the highest levels.
Read at: http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/09/09/how-fbi-went-easy-hillary-clinton
He must continue to remind people how wonderful life in America was, when liberal-directed government wasn't running their lives!
Young people (and some geezers as well) need to hear about what true freedom used to look like before the Clintons came to town - not what a great guy Trump is.
Trump can do it, even if it requires him to use a teleprompter!
I listened to the entire interview with Hannity, and I now have a better level of respect for the guy.
First, I think he goes to great lengths, to not harm national security.
Second, he said a couple on his side, were murdered.
So carefully screening the contents, is important.
(Because Republicans are racists, which they have been called since at least Reagan, and it works. So stick with what works.)
The DNC release, cost Wasserman-Schultz her position. Of course Clinton took her immediately onto the team, and no doubt pays her handsomely even if indirectly.
The public already knows the Clintons lie, but don’t seem to care very much.
The lies must be shown to be deadly, to cost people their lives, without any counter argument.
That might doom Hillary’s campaign. I am not optimistic.
Yeah, yeah. More “just wait until you see what we release” hype. I’ll believe it when I see it. Cut the hype and release the docs.
too many pages, too little time