Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well, that would be interesting in regards to amateur radio.
1 posted on 11/24/2016 2:46:48 AM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: markomalley

Great! Let’s buy cable and net from the provider we think provides the best service at the best price. Congress can take care of com monopolies.


41 posted on 11/24/2016 4:21:10 AM PST by momincombatboots (Pray for Sky, 20, two gunshots to abdomen, college student, hostess, easy prey n transformed US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I’m still not sick of winning.


49 posted on 11/24/2016 4:40:51 AM PST by Lazamataz (TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!! TRUMP WINS!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

They ever failed at reducing excessively loud TV commercials that was mandated by their failure counterparts in Congress.


51 posted on 11/24/2016 4:42:43 AM PST by exPBRrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The “watchdog” has morphed into Smaug.


56 posted on 11/24/2016 4:56:09 AM PST by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

A better bet is to break up the corporate oligarchy that controls the vast majority of the media.

Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch’s News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany and Viacom. That’s it. And just 15 billionaires own it all.

This is why news about our elections were so corrupted, that and the fact that almost all the major pollsters are “Friends of Bill and Hillary Clinton”.

So how do you break up the “big five”?

People thought it was impossible to break up the giant oil trust Standard Oil. Its controversial history as one of the world’s first and largest multinational corporations ended in 1911, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that it was an illegal monopoly.

It was based on The Sherman Antitrust Act (1890). It prohibits certain business activities that federal government regulators deem to be anti-competitive, and requires the federal government to investigate and pursue corporations that engage in them.

However, things change, so Sherman is seldom invoked, but the problems it was designed to address have evolved beyond it, avoiding those conditions that force the government to act.

So a new, anti-oligopoly act is needed. And while the MSM would be its primary targets, there are other industries that would also profit from having *their* oligopolies broken up.


58 posted on 11/24/2016 5:04:50 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Friday, January 20, 2017. Reparations end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
"Most of the original motivations for having an FCC have gone away,"

The original motivation was controlling what the public could hear. Arch-Progressive Herbert Hoover was Commerce Secretary at the time and wanted to head off the progress the courts had already made through common law to establish and define property rights in electromagnetic spectrum.

59 posted on 11/24/2016 5:10:45 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

With the internet’s effectively infinite channels, the FCC is an anachronism.


64 posted on 11/24/2016 5:30:23 AM PST by Flick Lives (Les Deplorables Triumphant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Nice. Markets sort this kind of thing out quickly.


65 posted on 11/24/2016 5:35:02 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I know some radio engineers who will be thrilled. Soon you’ll be able to hear their stations on Jupiter.


67 posted on 11/24/2016 5:41:23 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Facebook and Twitter should not be monitoring or censoring like the Chinese.
68 posted on 11/24/2016 5:49:31 AM PST by keving (Kevin Gray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

CFPB also.

DEFUND/DISMANTLE.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

But wait, there’s more...

https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/a


80 posted on 11/24/2016 6:03:08 AM PST by PGalt (CONGRATULATIONS Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley; All

Federal regulation of Internet coming, warn FCC, FEC commissioners

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fed-regulation-of-internet-coming-warn-fcc-fec-commissioners/article/2595304

Abolish the FCC


83 posted on 11/24/2016 6:09:26 AM PST by Democrat_media (President Trump has to change the 1965 immigration act so he can get a 2nd term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

We actually need spectrum management more than ever.


85 posted on 11/24/2016 6:13:16 AM PST by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Well, that would be interesting in regards to amateur radio.

Having been a licensed Amateur Radio operator for 60 years, I was thinking the same thing.

88 posted on 11/24/2016 6:18:35 AM PST by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The FCCs move to regulate the internet and to bring back any kind of equal time is very disturbing. There is a need for band assignment and interference control. Maybe conducted emission control, but the FCC has become a tool for censorship. This needs to come from Congress with a big hammer on their heads.


91 posted on 11/24/2016 6:26:54 AM PST by Dennis M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

Agree....


94 posted on 11/24/2016 6:40:33 AM PST by Squantos (Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

A private consortium like the IEEE would do a much better job than the FCC.

And the FAA, FDA, DoE, etc...


98 posted on 11/24/2016 6:46:51 AM PST by Dead Corpse (A Psalm in napalm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley
Some other agency would have to be tasked with the licensening and regulating the bandwidth or chaos will result. There have been problems with cellular screwing up some of the frequencies being used by GPS.

BUT for controlling radio, TV, Phones, and Internet - Absolutely NOT. Dump it for all those reasons.
100 posted on 11/24/2016 6:49:36 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

>> that would be interesting in regards to amateur radio <<

Yes. If this policy should be carried to its logical conclusion, hams would end up having to pay for their frequencies. Bad for hams, but probably good for everybody else.


102 posted on 11/24/2016 6:50:23 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

The FCC should only be involved in RF communications, the disruption of which can be dangerous. Cable and Internet do not “broadcast” in the traditional sense of the word, and should no more come under the control of the FCC than a newspaper.


108 posted on 11/24/2016 6:58:35 AM PST by bk1000 (A clear conscience is a sure sign of a poor memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson