Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Energy Department Refuses to Provide Names to Trump Team
NBC (Washington) ^ | Dec 13, 2016 | AP

Posted on 12/14/2016 4:54:51 AM PST by Texas Fossil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-268 next last
To: Texas Fossil

What does the administration want the names for if not to use it against them?


21 posted on 12/14/2016 5:16:10 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

DC is about to be Trumped.

God Bless the United States of America.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Every day when I go on FR and read what the President-elect and his people are doing, it confirms for me that GOD really is watching over the USA, and I am motivated to thank Him for the enormous blessings He is bestowing upon us through His servant, DONALD JOHN TRUMP.


22 posted on 12/14/2016 5:19:42 AM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (Make nice with your enemies and you will live to regret it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Maybe he wants to prepare commendations (or treats). Their next commands will be “play dead” and “roll over.”


23 posted on 12/14/2016 5:21:06 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (The Left has the temperament of a squealing pig.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Maybe he wants to prepare commendations (or treats).

And maybe I'll hit the Lotto this weekend too.

24 posted on 12/14/2016 5:22:22 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

This is probably obvious but the workforce isn’t the issue. The problem is the number of regulations that requires those in the energy field to respond to and those at the energy department to review and the overhead required. There are a lot of these departments, who are underfunded and understaffed, are simply trying to keep up with the thousands of government regulations. Just simply waste.

The only way to downsize the agencies is to do away with the regulations.


25 posted on 12/14/2016 5:22:34 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

What is the ‘energy output’ of those 100,000 employees???


26 posted on 12/14/2016 5:23:17 AM PST by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Don’t make the mistake that W made. Purge them all.


27 posted on 12/14/2016 5:25:49 AM PST by clintonh8r (AMERICA! THANK YOU FOR MAKING MY SCREEN NAME OBSOLETE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
Fire them from the top down

AND from the bottom up, and from the sides inward.

Then show Rick Perry, on camera, shutting off the main breaker...de-energizing the Energy Dept.

28 posted on 12/14/2016 5:26:53 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (The fear of stark justice sends hot urine down their thighs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

If you fire them....they will merely take you to court and you will have to have cause-and-reason...too much paperwork, if you ask me.

So, you start in January, with the travel budget cut by 90-percent.

In Feb, you eliminate all travel outside of the US itself.

In March, you direct that for each ten billets that become empty...HR can only hire one single replacement....no matter what grade or profession they are.

In April, you decide to do a building renovation project and temporarily move a quarter of all employees to some building that is half-way to Baltimore.

In May, you bring in a management consulting company to do a business audit and quality review...making everyone participate for at least six to eight weeks.

In July, you introduce a rule that requires all lawyers within the organization to be trained for such-and-such certification (worthless in nature, but it consumes 60 man-hours of their time).

In August, you mandate that the word “toxic” is bad to use and a new word must be used. You start to repeat this procedure every other week.

In September, you cut half of the IT contractor support....so that systems are down longer in the future.

Week by week, you make their future miserable. By the end of the year...at least a quarter of the folks there have resumes out and seeking new employment. By the end of two years....roughly one-third of all employees have left for other jobs. No cost impact to the government....other than wasting their time and making them to do unnecessary work.


29 posted on 12/14/2016 5:27:33 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil
The Energy Department has a $32 billion annual budget

Well, I can see where 32 billion can be shaved from the budget.

30 posted on 12/14/2016 5:29:31 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (The fear of stark justice sends hot urine down their thighs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

They’ve had a hard time staffing Yucca Mountain jobs, the pool just got larger.


31 posted on 12/14/2016 5:31:21 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

How many of them are “at will”?


32 posted on 12/14/2016 5:34:19 AM PST by fivecatsandadog (GO TRUMP! Drain the swamp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

No problem. You appointed a new Head, when they take over they issue a memo to all department heads with that request those that do not comply get fired. Grade school time will soon be over. The adults are coming!


33 posted on 12/14/2016 5:36:53 AM PST by 48th SPS Crusader (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

“… it is good to fire a government employee from time to time, it encourages the performance the others” A reasoned application of the “Byng Protocol” will greatly improve performance plus the morale of the diligent.

John Byng
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Byng


34 posted on 12/14/2016 5:38:14 AM PST by Huaynero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

It’s Trump’s team who wants the names.

Unless your use of the word “Administration” means Trump, but that is confusing, as only Obama fits that at the present time.


35 posted on 12/14/2016 5:40:04 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Those names will be provided on Jan 21st. :-)


36 posted on 12/14/2016 5:40:21 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
If you fire them....they will merely take you to court and you will have to have cause-and-reason...too much paperwork, if you ask me.

I'm not sure that's 100% true in this case.

As the article states, Dept of Energy has about 10,000 Federal employees, but over 100,000 contractors.

Eliminating contracts (and therefore the contractors) doesn't need a court order.

The contract is just not renewed. Easy-peasy.

37 posted on 12/14/2016 5:43:56 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

100k contractors?

What, are most of those some schmoes out in the field offering “free” energy audits or something?

If so, I doubt they are the major problem.


38 posted on 12/14/2016 5:45:37 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Good ideas. I don’t think Trump will have any problem working the system against them. He is smart and they are stupid and lazy. Make them do “something” and they will leave en mass.


39 posted on 12/14/2016 5:46:28 AM PST by DrDude (To the Victor go the spoils! Kick A$$ Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

It just makes it easy. They can fire them for cause. Refused a direct order.


40 posted on 12/14/2016 5:47:46 AM PST by xzins (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-268 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson