Posted on 04/03/2017 7:41:42 AM PDT by Hojczyk
Looks like it was Susan Rice...
What the heck was she doing even looking at this info? And when did BO know?
The “Surveillance was for a YEAR. Even Trump ‘Supporters’ were survailed and their names unmasked.
“Looks like it was Susan Rice...
What the heck was she doing even looking at this info? And when did BO know?”
If it does turn out to be Susan Rice that puts things right at the feet of Obama. Hehehehe
And Susan Rice’s husband is Ian O Cameron who used to be with ABC news. Don’t know where he is now but Obama staff had/has many many ties to main stream media who are still covering for Obama and all.
Plausible deniability.
I’d bet $1000 Obammy first started surveillance on Trump back when Trump was going after Obammy’s birth certificate.
What the heck was she doing even looking at this info? And when did BO know?
At minimum it was Rice. Who knows how many other bad actors were and probably still are involved who are embedded deep in the bureaucracy of the DC government.
Heads must roll...
Good call. I think you’re probably correct.
“***So for example, if I call somebody in Bulgaria, and that’s picked up somehow by our agencies and there’s nothing there involving national security, there’s nothing there involving a crime, that report would come out and it would say “American number one” or my name would not be there. What I’m told now is that when these reports came out, names were there and that is unprecedented. Basically, they say the information that’s unmasking, these names of Americans who had done nothing wrong was disseminated to all of NSC, some at DoD, Clapper, Brennan — basically the people at the top.***”
1. They should be running a trawler which catches anything and everything in its net.
2. They should destroy any records not Germain and particular to a warrant which would contain the names of the individuals who the givernment has “Probable” Cause to believe they committed a particular crime .
What the givernment does is akin to obtaining a warrant of probable cause and searching every room in a building for their suspect and the evidence to support their allegation.
Never mind that the suspect likely did not have access to every area of the building.
They will sweep up huge swaths of information they don’t need and just keep it.
PING!!!!
Article and comments, esp 2 has the transcript of Adam Housley’s reporting
Thanks, Hojczyk
Thanks for the ping & thanks, hojczyk for the transcript !
Bears repeating:
“According to Housley, it was done at the direction of those “very high up” and was done so for “a significant amount of time,” which he described as “unprecedented” and “blockbuster.”
Transcript as follows:
We don’t know who spoke to Devin Nunes. We know it’s not someone at the White House. We don’t know who spoke to the White House about this other than what Nunes has said in front of press conferences. The sources we are talking to are separate from both of those entities. They don’t really have a horse in this game. They are frustrated with the way they say the agencies are being politicized more than they have seen before in their careers. And one reason they are speaking out is because of that. The second reason is because Nunes came out in front of the cameras and has his finger on it, they say and want to make sure it is done correctly.
What we’ve learned is this — from multiple sources is that it’s all about intelligence-gathering methods. The fact is, a lot of these men and women in the intelligence communities did not want to speak about what’s going on because they were concerned about those methods being known. But now they figure they might as well at least clarify things since Nunes has been leaked to by someone they don’t know or at least they tell me they don’t know. We know that there was this — there was surveillance of Trump and people close to Donald Trump including some supporters for up to a year before inauguration. That information was disseminated we’re told through NSA channels. It’s unprecedented the way this was done. The mention of U.S. citizens is supposed to be masked. That means basically taken out of the report.
So for example, if I call somebody in Bulgaria, and that’s picked up somehow by our agencies and there’s nothing there involving national security, there’s nothing there involving a crime, that report would come out and it would say “American number one” or my name would not be there. What I’m told now is that when these reports came out, names were there and that is unprecedented. Basically, they say the information that’s unmasking, these names of Americans who had done nothing wrong was disseminated to all of NSC, some at DoD, Clapper, Brennan — basically the people at the top.
They also say I’m told Rice knew about this possibly as well. Now, I know there are some reports out there that she was the one who ordered this. We do not know who reported this because we have not spoken to Devin Nunes about it. He has not at least told us these things. So, we don’t know what papers he saw. Our sources don’t know what papers he saw. They just tell us about the information about unmasking names from Donald Trump and his team and his family was disseminated to a very select few at the top and was done so for a significant amount of time. And that is blockbuster, guys. As far as we know hasn’t been done at least in modern times when it comes to this type of thing. Also, as we look down at some of my notes here going through this, that there were also additional unmasking as well and, again, as far as we can tell, none of this had anything to do with national security.”
Thanks, Hojczyk !!
If she ordered it alone nothing would matter. BUT it was what was done with the material after it was unmasked. There lies the crime !
Expel all foreigners.
MAGA.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.