Posted on 04/04/2017 11:45:46 AM PDT by ColdOne
Does that mean you leaked something to somebody?
“I don’t have no money”
It is a correct statement if you have cash in your pocket.
One of the problems that Rice has with being a sack of scum liar is that nobody ever believes anything she says.
Dindu Muffins.
Dindu Nuffins.
Unmasked surveillance info miraculously appears on the desk of NY Times reporter.
“I lead nothing to nobody”
By the rule of double negative, this means she leaked everything to everybody... admitted the truth without realizing it.
The fact is her asking for the unmasking is a crime...and corruption and proves what Trump claimed.
She sounds like a petulant child caught with her hand in the cookie jar.
I ain't got no body ...
I am going to predict that the Trump team already has their whistle blower on hand to testify with proof against her. With everything Trump does, he has already done his homework on it and is now setting the perjury traps that could snare a Grizzly. Notice how his “wire-tapped” tweet set the stage to get all of those people on the record countering it?
Did she mean she leaked THE nothing to THE nobody? Those words are a selection of gibberish so there is the appearance she said something that had the appearance a denial without it actually having any meaning whatsoever.
She is grammatically correct. She did not leak nothing to nobody. She leaked something to somebody.
—
Yes. Very Clintonesque of her.
Ah, the standard dindonuffin argument.
Coming from the standard perp.
I think the Investigation is already underway Sue ,maybe Obama needs a Roomate
Well, okay, if you say so.
================================================
Pres Trump needs to announce ASAP, that since this is all legal, his administration will step up and do the legal thing to protect Americans' safety and security.
They'll be surveilling and unmasking any and all Democrats, on a continuing non-stop basis, particularly Democrats who have talked with any outside ambassadors, foreign offshore entities, and the like.
Plus, the Trump administration will ask for the unmasking of all those who are involved in such talks... because it is legal.
AND Trump will use Obamas "legal" rules to distribute that information to every US intelligence agency. (HAT TIP BUBBA GUMP SHRIMP)
==============================================
Can't wait to watch the Democrat worms squirm.
Oh course she didn’t. She had the material that would be leaked developed, when it would not have been. She then gave it to people who would leak it. She probably even talked to people in the media and told them the kinds of things they might want to pressure sources (other then her) for.
So in the end she parsed words just like Bill Clinton of the Big Zero. She didn’t leak anything to anyone and yet she was ultimately a key player in making sure stuff was leaked for partisan political purposes.
That statement is in no semantic conflict with the implied “I leaked everything to everybody.”
She must be using Slick Willie’s semantics coach.
Stop thinking of this as a media interview.
When Andrea Mitchell interviews Susan Rice, it's a televised stage performance with two actors playing their scripted parts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.