Posted on 04/05/2017 6:17:01 AM PDT by pgkdan
Wouldn’t you want to know what Cruz was up to too? What about every Republican candidate? This was extensive and I believe this is just the tip of the iceberg.
“Vince foster paid...
He left th(e) WH rolled up in a rug!”
Don’t be silly. EVERYONE takes their rug out for a walk.
In Vince’s case, the rug walked back home, alone.
Somewhere, outside, a dog was barking.
I would add: Why the hell is Comey still Director of the FBI?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I ask myself the same question every day. The.”That they can”t find anyone to replace him”, is pure bullshit. These people are a cancer to President Trump. Everyone knows what cancer does to the host if it is allowed to run its course.
If they can do it, Trump’s people can do it.
Libs are scared Shiffless about Trump abusing power. How much do they want to defend what Obama’s people did if that means Trump’s people can get away by providing a “plausible excuse”? Even if they think Obama’s people had legit reason for “stretching the rules”, they probably don’t want to provide Trump’s people a template for how to get away with surveilling enemies and leaking info. They may want to start arguing that incidental surveillance and unmasking are REAL BIG DEALS.
All this begs the question, if they were monitoring the Trump campaign, one few political “experts” believed had any chance of ultimate success, what other Republican candidates were under similar or even more intrusive surveillance? Bush? Cruz? All of them? I can’t get my head around them going after Trump as early as October, 2015 when expectations then were still centered around drubs like Jeb Bush. Just speculation, but I think they must have had several campaigns as well as the RNC infiltrated and under electronic surveillance, all with the expectation that there was no way Hillary Clinton could lose.
THey also make it sound like it is only a bottom up process. Ultimately, the “IC” has to produce the information that the swells at the top WANT or they’ll quickly find themselves out of the loop.
Perp walk. I wanna see a perp walk. Been so long. Since THAT kinda winnin’.
Couldn't agree more. Either we respect and enforce the rule of law or sink to the level of a banana republic.
It’s almost as if the Trump team applied Occam’s Razor. They KNEW the Osama regime could listen to them, so which is more likely, that they would do it? Or not. Duh. So much of Trump is below the surface. The must have had counter-intel pros in there somewhere.
“........we also have President Trump and there’s NO WAY he’s going to let this stand.”.......
Trump cannot do it alone and who amongst us sees the Rinos stepping up to put those guilty in jail? I see but a very tiny few who MIGHT attempt getting the ball rolling but they are too few in numbers. Unfortunately, when you are a high up politician, you are “immune” from U.S. laws. What a massive undertaking it will be for Trump to “drain the swamp” all by himself.
The timeline is key. If they started spying on Trump BEFORE wikileaks announced that they had gotten Democrat emails (and the subsequent allegations of Russian hacking), then they had NO REASON to start surveillance of Trump's communications other than for political purposes.
Both, and both clinton and obama....
Unless we still hang traitors.
Congress is nothing but drama for drama’s sake anymore.
Apparently there is a political cost to firing the FBI director - makes it look like you got something to hide.
That's what I'm saying....she pulled a specific file....a Trump file. Light on the early end....heavy, really heavy as the election nears.
Likely all the candidates had a "light" file.
All he said was he thought he could work with Putin.
I think Comey is the weak link. He will take everyone down.
Who do you think dems were blackmailing with their incidental data collecting and sharing???? There will be no one going to jail.
A couple of members of the Control-LEFT media need to be hauled into court.
It takes two sides for this ceremonial dance to be properly played out.
Congress can't send anyone to jail and any hearing they hold will be just as useless as the Benghazi investigation and hearings turned out to be. Great for cable news ratings but useless nonetheless.
This is the purview of the Justice Department. Trump's Justice Department.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.