Skip to comments.
'China must be prepared to TOPPLE Kim Jong-un or WE'LL do it', former US chief claims (Condi)
Express ^
| May 8, 2017
| VINCENT WOOD
Posted on 05/07/2017 8:23:54 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
She shares part of blame by offering only carrots to woo N. Korea, which made things worse. Now she demands somebody else to fix the problem she created by resorting to extreme means. She could do service for us by stay out of N. Korea debate.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Rice is an incompetent fool. Trump needs to stays FAR away from her.
2
posted on
05/07/2017 8:25:53 PM PDT
by
montag813
To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; ...
It appears that toppling Kim Jong-un regime is one subject both Trump and Deep State are in full agreement.
3
posted on
05/07/2017 8:27:13 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Rice was on the mark vis-a-vis N. Korea. The only problem, like you say, she did nothing during her tenure to work this problem.
She’s miles ahead of SoS Clinton or SoS albreit.
4
posted on
05/07/2017 8:29:11 PM PDT
by
Fhios
To: TigerLikesRooster
Are Susan Rice and Condoleeza Rice sisters ?
5
posted on
05/07/2017 8:29:46 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: TigerLikesRooster
The Fashion Police need to terminate this guy, with predjudice , for his hair cut alone....
6
posted on
05/07/2017 8:30:43 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition mobile devices. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: TigerLikesRooster
You may not recall but the SOS carries out the wishes of the president and would not disagree in public.
So people here who say what she should have done are barking up the wrong tree.
To: morphing libertarian
Foggy Bottom is, well, foggy. Inputs do not equal outputs.
8
posted on
05/07/2017 8:36:10 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition mobile devices. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: UCANSEE2
Condoleeza Rice is an only child according to Wikipedia.
.
9
posted on
05/07/2017 8:38:03 PM PDT
by
LucyT
To: morphing libertarian
I am not sure of that. President does not know everything and depends on other administration members for advice. Condi was reportedly the most trusted one for Bush. It is not as if he made his decision fully on his own and ordered her to carry it out.
It was her agenda which Bush accepted. Stop apologizing for Condi. She is not a sacred human being who should be always held in high regard. She is incompetent do-gooder, who should rather be a preacher than SOS. I don't know why people have such a soft spot for her.
10
posted on
05/07/2017 8:39:46 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: TigerLikesRooster
I heard a mule braying in my neighbor’s pasture yesterday. He made just as much sense as she does.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Rice is part of the problem.
12
posted on
05/07/2017 8:46:41 PM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
To: TigerLikesRooster
WE'LL do itWhat you mean "we," Kemo Sabe?
13
posted on
05/07/2017 8:49:22 PM PDT
by
MUDDOG
To: TigerLikesRooster
I’m not apologizing for anyone. You don’t know anything about their communications and her personal position on NK. The only thing you can surmise since you weren’t in the room is she carried out the wishes of the president. The rest is a WAG, wild-ass guest.
To: TigerLikesRooster
15
posted on
05/07/2017 8:55:38 PM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(I did NOT elect liberal Democrats IVANKA and JARED to ANYTHING! (I doubt you did, too.))
To: AmericanInTokyo
She has ZILCH credibility on this issue.
16
posted on
05/07/2017 8:57:33 PM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(I did NOT elect liberal Democrats IVANKA and JARED to ANYTHING! (I doubt you did, too.))
To: morphing libertarian
“You may not recall but the SOS carries out the wishes of the president and would not disagree in public.
So people here who say what she should have done are barking up the wrong tree.”
This ^^^^^^
To: TigerLikesRooster
They really have no choice....it may be delayed as long as possible but they will be taking the Kim Regime down. However S. Korea is key in that respect....they cannot do so without the South agreeing fro what I understand.
If they do a deal otherwise it will be because of S. Korea and China holding it back and agreeing to let Kim have his nukes. That’s just not reasonable....it would be like S Korea putting a gun to their own head.
18
posted on
05/07/2017 9:02:55 PM PDT
by
caww
To: morphing libertarian
If you argue that we don't know anything because we are not there, how do we know what Susan Rice or Hillary Clinton did? It may be all Obama's doing and they are just robots to carry out his order.
Your supposition is more of a fantasy than mine. You don't have any other argument than totally disregarding what was reported or what she said because we were not there. Using the same logic, all Hitler's men may not be guilty, either. It could be all he was doing. Were we there to find out for sure?
19
posted on
05/07/2017 9:15:46 PM PDT
by
TigerLikesRooster
(dead parakeet + lost fishing gear = freep all day)
To: montag813
Agreed. Another Bush minion. They don’t keep well. Rove. Rice. Powell. Bleh!
20
posted on
05/07/2017 9:17:35 PM PDT
by
Psalm 144
("You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war." - William Randolph Hearst, 1897)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-114 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson