Here are the Chief Justice Robert's remarks in question. Leaving this full size to avoid pixellation. Font choice not mine lol.
Obamma must still be holding something over roberts' head.
hey chief chickenshit roberts...TELL IS AGAIN HOW THE OBAMACARE PENALTY IS ACTUALLY A TAX YOU SON OF A TURNIP.
Here are the Chief Justice Robert's remarks in question. Leaving this full size to avoid pixellation. Font choice not mine lol.
Blackmail or NWO Bush Trojan horse, that is the question.
Doubt we’ll ever find out.
Roberts is a lightweight jealous of a philosophical and principled thinker.
Roberts - stealth liberal, like Souter.
Roberts is an accidental chief justice. Alito should have been it.
The court should speak with one voice. What is he talking about? He must be talking about Ginsberg criticizing candidate Trump or the the US Constitution while in South Africa.
Who cares what Justice Roberts thinks?
He betrayed the American people and himself when he voted in favor of Obamacare after previously excoriating it.
He’s not to be trusted.
SCOTUS should not be a lifetime appointment.
Roberts seems to care more about style than substance.
The purpose of the Court is to adjudicate cases by applying the Constitution as written ans originally understood and intended.
The issue isn’t unity in unconstitutional decisions. The issue is constitutionally-sound decisions, and then you should get unity.
Best Answer
The additional powers of the chief justice over a regular supreme court justice are quite minimal. The main difference is that the Chief Justice often has the say on who gets to write the opinion of the court for a particular case (that’s given that the Chief Justice is on the majority side).
Other than that it is largely a figure head. Sometimes he has reponsbilities for swearing in other officials. He also has the responsilibity for overhearing impeachment trials of high government officials.
It has nothing to do with what what cases the Supreme Court will hear, that is decided by all justices, but the Chief Justice does preside over S. Ct. meetings so he has some ability to steer the agenda
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080114150420AAUyJsd
It must be embarrassing for Roberts to have to argue against a passionate intellectual superior, such as Justice Gorsuch. The young whipper snapper simply refuses to serve the coffee and take a back seat. If you can’t defend America, Roberts, resign NOW.
Looks like the Deep State has some secrets on Chief Justice Roberts.
He can opine all he wants to, but that doesn’t make it so, and I hope Gorsuch will continue to give his opinions. That’s the only way we really get to see how they really think.