Posted on 08/04/2017 11:12:19 AM PDT by ForYourChildren
The article says he was 17 BTW.
So a 17 year old living on his own doing this is different than what the title and excerpt implied.
It made it sound like a young boy came home from school a girl.
[S]he probably wouldn’t notice the difference.
If the procedure requires consent and the “doctors” and guidance counselors did not have it, then arrest them all and charge them with assault, child abuse, conspiracy to commit child abuse, sexual abuse of a child, assault with a deadly weapon (scalpel)...
I’m no lawyer, but surely something can be done short of the “2nd amendment solution”, if only the prosecutors had the will...
Read closer. It said he had been living on his own for 2 years.
At this point any monies I had reserved for legal counsel would re-directed to ammo purchases. I would start killing MF’ers to protect my child.
Living on his own for two years.
So, if he’s 17 now, he was 15 when he started living on his own.
And when he dies, and whatever ripe old age, he’ll still be XY and a male. Period. End of story, end of paragraph, Le Fin
Yep, but that pretty much kills the outraged parent part of the story.
Need to find better cases than this to support this threads main narrative.
Chances are that he would like that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.