Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dunkirk: Healing Sick Minds
Townhall.com ^ | August 7, 2017 | Katie Kieffer

Posted on 08/07/2017 4:35:31 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: GreyFriar

The RAF could not afford to defend Dunkirk airspace. They had the Battle of Britain to get ready for.

RAF pilots shot down would be lost. Whereas during the Battle of Britain it was the German pilots lost when shot down due to the Brits’ controlling much of the English channel.


21 posted on 08/07/2017 6:05:57 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

How do you portray soldiers, defeated in battle, and facing death, in a more favorable light than the calm order of waiting in line for their potential salvation?


22 posted on 08/07/2017 6:08:56 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Women who are 25 pounds overweight tend to live longer than the men who mention it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Justa

Justa,

You are correct and have given another reason that the troops on the ground didn’t know.

Frank


23 posted on 08/07/2017 6:14:05 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Air support was absolutely limited as the RAF needed to hoard its supply of fighters to meet the certain Luftwaffe attacks and possible invasion. Warships larger than DDs were not sent to Dunkirk. The port was small andlarger ships could not maneuver to avoid the Stukas.
As for his portrayal of the Tommies I think it was very realistic. Men want to survive, especially those who have just been beaten six ways from Sunday. But there was still discipline among them as they stood in line.
The review echoes my feelings if this film.


24 posted on 08/07/2017 6:31:20 AM PDT by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
then there’s only two groups on the face of the Earth who’d do something this crazy (Americans and Brits).

Disagree. There would be Aussies who would pay to be in on that kind of thing, although I guess you could call them Brits too. That is, if you wanted to lose some teeth.
25 posted on 08/07/2017 6:56:50 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy
Yup, "under the guns" out front - she is on the second floor with not a speck of dust anywhere on her. Very well cared for, indeed!

But, lest we forget - on orders from on high, direct from Berlin - the panzers were stopped short.

26 posted on 08/07/2017 6:57:09 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I rarely go to movies, but I had to see this one. I went with some decidedly senior British friends. We all loved it. The movie was done very well, telling the story from the eyes of the soldiers trying to live through it - also from a pilot’s view - and that of a civilian.

Well done indeed.


27 posted on 08/07/2017 7:02:01 AM PDT by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

If you didn’t know anything about Dunkirk, you won’t know much more afterwards. Waste of time.
Yes Churchill did withhold assets because the RN needed modern destroyers for the convoys and the big ships had to be ready to stop an invasion. The RAF had limited time over the beaches, 1 maybe 2 sorties per plane per day vs 4-5 sorties per plane for Luftwaffe. Also he needed enough to defend Britain. The French army lost more men defending France after Dunkirk than before Dunkirk


28 posted on 08/07/2017 8:05:21 AM PDT by bravo whiskey (Never bring a liberal gun law to a gun fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jamaksin

The area chosen for the evacuation was surrounded by marsh and was seperated by a canal that was flooded as the defensive lines were set up. Apparently very difficult to get tanks through the area.

So Hitler went with air power and lost a lot of aircraft to the spitfires. I think it was a logical decision on his part.


29 posted on 08/07/2017 8:22:18 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice
Yep, I talked about this with Mrs WBill last night.

There were two or three world-changing events in the last century, and Dunkirk (and the time surrounding it) was one of them.

For instance, Guderian halted his Panzers, allowing the Brits and French to reinforce Dunkirk and the escape to happen. If he keeps pushing, it's likely that the pocket is more or less annihilated, and the Brits sue for peace. Or, are wiped out themselves. Either way, America and Germany likely arrive at a negotiated armistice, with America probably getting the worst of it.

IMO, and there's always room for discussion, Dunkirk was the moment in time that irrevocably changed the direction of world history.

30 posted on 08/07/2017 8:29:06 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Dunkirk” has become controversial:

Why the lack of Indian and African faces in Dunkirk matters: The blockbuster purports to be a historical portrayal, but in fact it’s a whitewash. And these decisions help corrode societal attitudes — The Guardian, August 1, 2017

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/01/indian-african-dunkirk-history-whitewash-attitudes

‘Dunkirk’ Sparks Debate in India Over Failure to Show Soldiers From the Country — Hollywood Reporter, July 28, 2017

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/dunkirk-sparks-debate-india-failure-show-soldiers-country-1024935

Does Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk ignore the role of the Indian army? — BBC, July 27, 2017

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-40724861

Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk forgot the Indian soldiers’ contribution, but does it matter? — Hindustan Times, July 25, 2017

http://www.hindustantimes.com/hollywood/christopher-nolan-s-dunkirk-forgot-the-indian-soldiers-contribution-but-does-it-matter/story-6RbD2aewVW0vUbhJZyfDjM.html

How Nolan forgot the desis at Dunkirk — The Times of India, July 23, 2017

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/how-nolan-forgot-the-desis-at-dunkirk/articleshow/59719803.cms


31 posted on 08/07/2017 8:48:33 AM PDT by Jyotishi (Seeking the truth, a fact at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy
Perhaps.

At that time the German engineers, having prepared for the "low countries" had ample "bridging equipment." Not quite the Bailey bridges in 1944-45, but still easy-peasy.

32 posted on 08/07/2017 8:54:45 AM PDT by jamaksin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: drpix

“So Proudly We Hail” (1943) remains one of the best films to depict and honor the sacrifices of women during WWII. Starring Claudette Colbert, Paulette Goddard, and Veronica Lake as front-line Army nurses in the opening months of the war in the Philippines who confront impossible odds, caring for ever-mounting casualties with every dwindling supplies and facilities.

The movie does include the requisite 40s-era romantic storylines, but tender moments are fleeting and depicted realistically. All the more to emphasize these nurses had to be tough and thorougly professional to cope with extraordinarily demanding circumstances for which no amount of training could have prepared them.

https://youtu.be/2o0p90LJDpc


33 posted on 08/07/2017 9:01:09 AM PDT by agave (5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: agave

I though “So Proudly....” was as good as Mrs Miniver. Even though it didn’t win as many Oscars.

The later came to mind 1st because it included her civilian husband’s participation in the Dunkirk evacuation.

The sort of realism that totally eludes the dimwitted PC crusaders like the bitching Bonner critic.


34 posted on 08/07/2017 9:11:20 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

I’ve got the 1958 version on DVD. Great movie! John Mills, Richard Attenborough, Bernard Lee (M).


35 posted on 08/07/2017 10:45:47 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy
Britain lost 6 destroyers early in the fight and pulled the Navy back to save their resources for the next stage of that e fight. Sometimes this simply has to be done. This is war, not a tv show Difficult decisions a made and executed.

"War is a series of calamities that result in victory."

36 posted on 08/07/2017 10:47:50 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: avital2
this is a great movie - but i do not want to see it again. it was horribly intense building to a feverish pitch when i thought i couldn’t bear it any more - in the movie theater! i have only felt that way once before - during the ghetto liquidation scene in “Schindler’s List.” i recommend it highly.

The ending of "Katyn" is the one that most got to me. It's probably a good thing there weren't any Russians in my immediate vicinity after I saw it.

37 posted on 08/07/2017 10:49:29 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

Six British and three French destroyers were sunk, along with nine other major vessels. In addition, 19 destroyers were damaged. Over 200 British and Allied sea craft were sunk, with a similar number damaged. The Royal Navy’s most significant losses in the operation were six destroyers:
Grafton, sunk by U-62 on 29 May
Grenade, sunk by air attack at Dunkirk on 29 May
Wakeful, sunk by a torpedo from the E-boat S-30 on 29 May
Basilisk, Havant, and Keith, sunk by air attack off the beaches on 1 June

The French Navy lost three destroyers:
Bourrasque, mined off Nieuport on 30 May
Sirocco, sunk by the E-boats S-23 and S-26 on 31 May
Le Foudroyant, sunk by air attack off the beaches on 1 June

The RAF lost 145 aircraft, of which at least 42 were Spitfires, while the Luftwaffe lost 156 aircraft in operations in the nine days of Operation Dynamo. The Royal Navy claimed the destruction of 35 Luftwaffe aircraft during the period from 27 May to 1 June and damage to another 21 aircraft. Aircraft losses from 10 May until the fall of France were 959 for the British and 1,279 for the Germans.


38 posted on 08/07/2017 2:56:47 PM PDT by packrat35 (Pelosi is only on loan to the world from Satan. Hopefully he will soon want his baby killer back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

“People like this need to be subjugated, disempowered, and then forced to make a man a sandwich.”

Not a bad start.

L


39 posted on 08/07/2017 4:10:29 PM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: packrat35; buffaloguy; Kaslin
A belated thank you for your cogent and easy to read logistics about the Dunkirk operation. I remember my Dad returning safely from Dunkirk in 1940. He did not elaborate on what he went through. He was in an old line infantry regiment- The Dorsetshire Regiment, a Platoon Sgt Major. He got a decoration for bravery at the Dendre Canal in Belgium. This for an action delaying the advance of the Germans. His platoon was backed up by the French light tanks and the Cameronians (Scotties).Then the enemy almost outflanked them and they had to retreat.

I saw the film and simply I am satisfied, as it is a wonderful tribute. That after all these years, so much time and effort to remember this action.

Please excuse the ramble.

40 posted on 08/07/2017 7:17:59 PM PDT by Peter Libra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson