Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dunkirk: Healing Sick Minds
Townhall.com ^ | August 7, 2017 | Katie Kieffer

Posted on 08/07/2017 4:35:31 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: pepsionice

I like your part about Americans and Brits. The more time goes by the more I like the Brits because I realize more and more how much of our basic outlook came from them. Just have an increasing sense of the heritage.


41 posted on 08/07/2017 7:32:21 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

The World At War - Alone (This covers Dunkirk)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWbOnyfusI0&t=135s


42 posted on 08/07/2017 7:42:00 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

Well, 300,000 troops is quite a lot of men to toss away in the event you have to fight another battle. I never was a fan of Churchill. He always seemed ready to sacrifice someone else to achieve his objectives.

He planned or at least supported the disastrous Gallipoli Campaign.

When asked how many American soldiers he needed, the response was “Just one and I will be certain to put him someplace where he will be shot.”

Read “Soldier of the Empire” about him in the Boer War. Brave, to be sure but less than an admirable character.

Finally, there is that rumor that keeps percolating out there that he and FDR engineered the Lusitania incident deliberately to kill American civilians to get into WW2.

Churchill had his strongpoints and he probably helped win WW2, but there is no denying he had a very, vary dark side.

And I know, war is war, but even in war there are some limits.

I just knew nothing about Dunkirk and was surprised about the comments about the air cover, but a search of the Net indicated what others have stated - there was RAF air cover, there where lots of German and British air losses and the film was not accurate in this respect.

And I still stand by my assertion that the film negatively presented the British troops there. Brits are brave men and centering it around one coward - the guy they picked up at sea, was unfair.


43 posted on 08/08/2017 7:34:07 AM PDT by ZULU (DUMP THAT POS PAUL RYAN AND MCCONNELL!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: buffaloguy

I think the battle WAS inspiring, but I felt that the movie did not adequately reflect that.

I bought another movie on Dunkirk that came out last year - another British production and I want to watch it to compare it to this one, as well as do some reading on the event.

I tend to avoid World War II as it really was so very very aweful.


44 posted on 08/08/2017 7:36:08 AM PDT by ZULU (DUMP THAT POS PAUL RYAN AND MCCONNELL!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Didn’t like the emphasis on the guy the guy they picked up at sea. Didn’t like the little vignette with the French soldier in the sinking ship. Liked the air combat with the spitfire.


45 posted on 08/08/2017 7:37:51 AM PDT by ZULU (DUMP THAT POS PAUL RYAN AND MCCONNELL!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bravo whiskey

Check out the resources on the net about the air battle over Dunkirk. The film was misleading.


46 posted on 08/08/2017 7:38:45 AM PDT by ZULU (DUMP THAT POS PAUL RYAN AND MCCONNELL!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

A British vet of Dunkirk saw it recently and said it was accurate.


47 posted on 08/08/2017 7:51:00 AM PDT by buffaloguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

Lusitania?

Wrong war

We get it you loves you some Churchill hate bra lol


48 posted on 08/08/2017 8:14:43 AM PDT by wardaddy (Virtue signalers should be shot...conservative ones racked and hanged then fed to dogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I know the Lusitania was WW1, BRO. And I am not black, smart @$$.

Churchill was Lord of the Admiralty in WW1 and his buddy FDR was Assistant Secretary of the Navy. The two of them conspired to have civilians on the Lusitania, the civilian passenger ship packed with munitions in violation of blockade rules, escorted into U-Boat infested waters, abandoned by British destroyers, and information about the munitions leaked to the Germans.


49 posted on 08/08/2017 1:48:54 PM PDT by ZULU (DUMP THAT POS PAUL RYAN AND MCCONNELL!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

I said bra not bro

That’s surfer dude talk

The province of peckerwoods and slopes

So be nice


50 posted on 08/08/2017 5:27:22 PM PDT by wardaddy (Virtue signalers should be shot...conservative ones racked and hanged then fed to dogs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

I don’t think I have ever seen it. I’ll add the DVD to my Christmas list.


51 posted on 08/09/2017 8:35:25 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

Didn’t realize there was a surf in Tennessee.


52 posted on 08/09/2017 9:23:15 AM PDT by ZULU (DUMP THAT POS PAUL RYAN AND MCCONNELL!! KIM FATTY the THIRD = Kim Jung Un)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson